论对海德格尔存在-神-逻辑学的解释模式——从存在-神-逻辑学的发展过程出发  

On the Interpretation Mode of Heidegger's Onto-theo-logy:Start from the Progress of the Development of Onto-theo-logy

作　　者：甘从营 Gan Congying

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学哲学与社会发展学院

出　　处：《哲学门》2024年第1期126-139,共14页Beida Journal of Philosophy

摘　　要：在海德格尔的存在-神-逻辑学机制有关的文本中,存在着被学界长期忽视的提出、突破到完成的过程。从这个发展过程上看,存在论和神学共属一体的方式及其本质来源(die Wesensherkunft)问题才是存在-神-逻辑学的核心问题,而《哲学论稿》中提出的存在者性(Seiendheit)和最存在者(das Seiendste)在解决存在论和神学共属一体的方式中处于关键的位置,对存在-神-逻辑学的本质来源问题的追问则最终将其引向了存在论差异。在国内学界中占据统治地位的解释模式不仅忽视了存在论和神学共属一体的方式,以及解决这一方式的存在者性和最存在者,而且也忽视了存在-神-逻辑学的本质来源问题。In this article,I depicted the process of the development of Heidegger’s onto-theo-logy,which includes the proposition,the breakthrough and the completion of onto-theo-logy.From the process of the development of ontotheo-logy,we can see that the unity in which ontology and theology are unified and the essential origin of onto-theo-logy are the core issues of Heidegger’s ontotheo-logy.Beingness and Seiendste proposed in Contributions to Philosophy(of the Event)are crucial to the solution of the problem of the way in which ontology and theology are unified.The exploring of the origin of onto-theo-logy shows that ontotheo-logy has a relation with the ontological difference.The interpretation mode of onto-theo-logy inherited by the Chinese academic community not only neglects the way in which ontology and theology are unified,beingness and Seiendste,which are the key points of the solution of the problem of the way of this unity,but also neglects the origin of onto-theo-logy.

关 键 词：海德格尔 存在-神-逻辑学 发展过程 解释模式 存在者性 

分 类 号：B516.54[哲学宗教—外国哲学]