基于司法实践案例的委托加工专利产品侵权解析  

Analysis of Infringement of Patented Products by Original Equipment Manufacture Based on Judicial Practice Cases

作　　者：邓志烁 傅枫雅 DENG Zhishuo;FU Fengya(Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an 710100,China;Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court,Hangzhou 310008,China)

机构地区：[1]西北工业大学,陕西西安710100 [2]杭州市中级人民法院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《河南科技》2024年第24期119-123,共5页Henan Science and Technology

摘　　要：【目的】现行专利法及司法解释对于委托加工专利产品的侵权认定尚无明文规定,理论和司法实践对此也莫衷一是,因此有必要研究专利法意义上制造行为的内涵及在委托加工专利产品场景下责任界定的问题。【方法】本研究结合司法案例,区分将设计方案或技术方案通过自身产品加工予以物理呈现的行为,以及将设计方案或技术方案提供给他人实施产品加工的行为,来明确不同情形下制造行为的判定。【结果】在委托加工专利产品的场景中,依据设计方案或技术方案的来源判断是否构成制造行为,具体为:若受托方自行负责设计方案或技术方案,则受托方为产品制造者;若委托方提供设计方案或技术方案,受托方“按图加工”产品,则判断为委托方与受托方构成共同制造行为;若委托方与受托方合作确定设计方案或技术方案,则区分委托方对侵权方案持有的不同实施意思情况确定是否构成共同制造行为。【结论】第一种情形下,委托方不构成制造侵权,仅构成与受托方销售行为相对应的购买行为;第二种情形下,若产品侵犯他人专利权,委托方应与受托方共同承担责任;第三种情形下,若委托方对侵权方案持有积极实施意思,则与受托方共同承担制造责任,反之则由受托方单独承担制造责任。[Purposes]The current patent law and judicial interpretations of the Original Equipment Manufacture(OEM)of patented products for the infringement of the determination of the patent law is not yet clear while the theory and judicial practice of the theory and judicial practice of this is not agreed,so it is necessary to study the connotation of the patent law in the sense of the manufacture of the act and in the OEM of patented products scenarios of the definition of the responsibility of the problem.[Methods]This article combines judicial cases to distinguish between the act of physically presenting the design or technical program through its own product processing,and the act of providing the design or technical program to others for product processing,in order to clarify the determination of manufacturing behavior under different circumstances.[Findings]In the scenario of entrusted processing of patented products,judging whether it constitutes a manufacturing act based on the source of the design scheme or technical scheme is as follows:if the entrusted party is responsible for the design scheme or technical scheme on its own,then the entrusted party is the manufacturer of the product;if the entrusting party provides the design scheme or technical scheme,and the entrusted party processes the product“according to the drawings”,then the judgment is that the commissioning party and the entrusted party constitute a joint manufacturing behavior;if the commissioner cooperates with the entrusted party in determining the design or technical solution,the commissioner will distinguish between different implementation meanings of the infringing solution to determine whether it constitutes an act of joint manufacture.[Conclusions]In the first case,the entrusted party does not constitute manufacturing infringement,and only constitutes the purchase behavior corresponding to the sales behavior of the entrusted party;in the second case,if the product infringes on the patent right of another person,the entrusted party shall

关 键 词：委托加工 设计方案 技术方案 实施意思 责任承担 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]