罪错未成年人分级干预的“行为者主义”模式  

The“Actorism”Model of Graded Intervention for Delinquent Minors

作　　者：李子龙 Li Zilong

机构地区：[1]北京工商大学法学院

出　　处：《法治社会》2025年第1期25-36,共12页Law-Based Society

基　　金：最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“轻微犯罪起诉审查机制研究”(项目批准号:GJ2024C08);华中科技大学自主创新研究基金资助项目“罪错未成年人分级干预矫治的实践路径研究”(项目批准号:2024RQJD004)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：罪错未成年人分级干预从未成年人的个体性出发,通过层次分明的矫治方式,帮助未成年人成长发展,预防未成年人犯罪。与单纯处罚具有社会危害性的行为不同,如何对罪错事实进行合理分级关乎着干预措施的效果。对此,应从“行为主义”转向“行为者主义”,主次有序地审查与评估行为事实、风险事实以及人格事实。“行为者主义”模式在伦理层面的功能,以未成年人为本位满足了最佳利益原则的要求,能合理调整国家亲权与父母亲权之间的关系。在“行为者主义”的模式导向下,第四轮《刑事诉讼法》的修改,应当进一步规范罪错未成年人分级干预主体的行为,平衡未成年人司法中的多方利益,保障罪错未成年人的参与权,强化未成年人司法社会体系的“支持”功能。The hierachical intervention of delinquent juveniles starts from the individuality of the juvenile,helps the juvenile grow and develop,and prevents the juvenile crime by means of hierarchical correction.Unlike merely punishing socially harmful behavior,how to reasonably classify the facts of delinquency is crucial to the effectiveness of intervention measures.In this regard,there should be a shift from“behaviorism”to“actorism,”with a hierarchical and orderly examination and assessment of behavioral facts,risk facts,and personality facts.The ethical function of the“actorism”model is centered on minors,fulfilling the requirement of the best interests principle and enabling a reasonable adjustment of the relationship between state parental rights and parental rights.Guided by the“actorism”model,the fourth amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law should further standardize the behavior of the entities involved in graded intervention for delinquent minors,balance the multiple interests in juvenile justice,safeguard the participation rights of delinquent minors,and strengthen the“support”function of the juvenile justice social system.

关 键 词：罪错未成年人 分级干预 行为者主义 罪错事实 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]