士绅、僧人与平民的三种金鸡桥叙述——明前期泉州社会的“变”与“不变”  

Three Kinds of Narratives of the Jinji Bridge by Gentry,Monks and Commoners:The Changed and the Unchanged in Quanzhou Society during the Early Ming Dynasty

作　　者：杨园章 Yang Yuanzhang

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所

出　　处：《中国社会科学院大学学报》2024年第10期146-159,164,共15页Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

基　　金：中国社会科学院“青启计划”“泉州多元文化传统的发展与中华文明包容性研究”(2024QQJH146)的资助。

摘　　要：现存成化年间由泉州士绅和僧人撰写的两种金鸡桥重修碑记,以及天顺年间晋江下游平民的金鸡水利计划文本,是理解明前期泉州社会的重要线索。朱鉴等士绅推重辉煌的宋元历史记忆,定浩等僧人凸显僧人参与公共事务的传统,王廷慎的计划则反映出晋江平原村落居民由从事海上贸易到经营农田水利的生计转型。我们从中固然看到了泉州“逝去的繁荣”,但亦可见当地人在新的历史阶段的生存策略与生存空间,以及旧有传统仍然具有一定生命力的基本事实。经由金鸡桥,我们不仅能往来于晋江两岸,还可对明前期泉州社会的“变”与“不变”形成更加深入的认识。The two existing types of inscriptions on the reconstruction of Jinji Bridge,written by the gentry and monks in Quanzhou during the Chenghua period,along with the text of Jinji water conservancy project written by the commoners living in the lower reaches of Jinjiang River during the Tianshun period,provide important insights into Quanzhou society in the early Ming Dynasty.Gentry figures such as Zhu Jian emphasized the glorious historical memory of the Song and Yuan Dynasties,while monks like Ding Hao highlighted the tradition of monks'participation in public affairs.Wang Tingshen's plan reflected the transformation of village livelihood in the Jinjiang Plain from maritime trade to agricultural practices.In this case,we can certainly see"the Bygone Prosperity"of Quanzhou,but we can also observe the survival strategy and living space of the local people in the new historical stage,as well as the basic fact that the traditions remained alive.Through the Jinji Bridge,we can not only travel between the two sides of Jinjiang River,but also possible to develop a deeper understanding of the changed and the unchanged of Quanzhou society in the early Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：明代 泉州 金鸡桥 区域社会史 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]