弥合法系差异的探索:粤港澳大湾区商事仲裁法律的协同创新  

Bridging Legal Differences:Harmonization and Innovation of Commercial Arbitration Legal Regimes in the Greater Bay Area

作　　者：毛晓飞[1,2] Mao Xiaofei

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院国际法研究所 [2]中国社会科学院国家级涉外法治研究基地

出　　处：《国际法研究》2024年第6期128-143,共16页Chinese Review of International Law

基　　金：中国社会科学院学科建设“登峰战略”资助计划资助,编号DF2023YS34。

摘　　要：在普通法系与大陆法系的交织影响下,中国内地、香港地区及澳门地区的商事仲裁法律制度历经嬗变,呈现出共性与差异并存的制度形态。在“一国两制三法域”的独特政治与法律架构下,以《粤港澳大湾区发展规划纲要》为指引,推进粤港澳大湾区商事仲裁法律制度的协同创新,需在保持各法域独立性基础上,调和三地商事仲裁制度间的实质差异,加强规则衔接与机制对接,同时创新制度理念,以灵活应对湾区内外动态变化对商事争议解决带来的新兴挑战。单纯依靠传统法律移植论所倡导的法域间规则单向迁移难以回应这一复杂局面,而法律全球化论的一般性分析框架亦无法直接适用于区域性法律协同的场景。粤港澳大湾区的商事仲裁法律制度协同创新应被视为一个规则共商、共建与共享的体系化演进历程,通过持续采取自我参照与自我生产的系统性方法,构建出一个内在逻辑严密且不断自我革新与优化的粤港澳大湾区商事仲裁自创生法律(子)系统。为此,需采取与之匹配的系统性路径与措施,包括推动湾区商事仲裁法律协同创新立法,共建高水准机构来引导规则机制的衔接创新,鼓励湾区内的争议解决机构协商合作出台相应规范、标准或指引等,以促进普通法系与大陆法系间的结构耦合,为世界法治文明进步贡献“湾区模式”与“中国智慧”。Under the interplay of common law and civil law traditions,the commercial arbitration legal systems of China's mainland,Hong Kong region,and Macao region have undergone significant transformations,resulting in a mixed picture that is characterized by both commonalities and distinctions.Within the unique political and legal structure of“one country,two systems,three jurisdictions”,the harmonization and innovation of commercial arbitration legal regimes in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area(GBA),as articulated in the“Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area”,requires reconciling substantive differences in commercial arbitration while preserving the autonomy of each jurisdiction.It involves strengthening the alignment of legal norms,integrating procedural mechanisms,and advancing innovations of institutional conception to effectively address the emerging challenges in commercial dispute resolution stemming from dynamic changes both within and beyond the GBA.The traditional paradigm of legal transplantation theory,which emphasizes the unilateral transfer of rules between jurisdictions,is increasingly ill-suited to the complexity of this regional context.Similarly,the broad analytical framework of legal globalization theory lacks the granularity necessary for addressing the nuanced demands of regional legal collaboration.Instead,the harmonization and innovation of commercial arbitration legal regimes in the GBA should be viewed as a process of systemic and iterative evolution with co-development,co-construction,and co-sharing of rules.By continuously adopting a self-referential and self-productive systematic approach,a self-created legal(sub)system for commercial arbitration in the GBA with a rigorous internal logic and continuous self-innovation and optimization can be established.Achieving this vision necessitates a suite of tailored,systematic strategies.This includes advancing legislative efforts to facilitate the legal harmonization and innovation across the

关 键 词：粤港澳大湾区 商事仲裁 法律移植 法律全球化 法律自创生系统 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]