“人道主义”四次论争与中国当代文学批评人学属性的回归  

The Four Debates on“Humanism”and the Return of the Humanistic Nature of Contemporary Chinese Literary Criticism

作　　者：龙其林 LONG Qilin(School of Humanities,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学人文学院,上海200240

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期141-151,共11页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国现代文学批评域外思想资源整理与研究(1907—1949)”(21&ZD258);上海交通大学文科创新团队培育计划“社会转型关键词与中国当代文学批评”(WKCX061)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：人道主义观念和思想,在中国当代文学批评回归正常的过程中发挥了重要作用:20世纪50、60年代,巴人、钱谷融等曾经为之辩护;十一届三中全会以后,朱光潜、黄药眠等理论家重又讨论人性与人道主义;20世纪80年代前期,兰秀良、王锐生,周扬、王若水与胡乔木等,围绕着人道主义和异化问题发生两次激烈论争。人道主义经过多次论争,得到作家、批评家认可,重新成为文学批评的重要思想资源,推动了思想解放运动的进行,为中国当代文学批评的健康发展创造了理论空间和舆论环境。Humanitarian concepts and ideas have played an important role in the process of returning to normal in contemporary Chinese literary criticism.In the 1950s and 1960s,Ba Ren,Qian Gurong,and others defended it;After the Third Plenum of the Eleventh Central Committee,theorists such as Zhu Guangqian and Huang Yaomian once again discussed human nature and humanitarianism;In the early 1980s,there was a heated debate between Zhou Yang,Wang Ruoshui,and Hu Qiaomu over issues of humanitarianism and alienation.After multiple debates,humanitarianism has been recognized by writers and critics,and has once again become an important ideological resource in literary criticism,promoting the progress of the ideological liberation movement and creating theoretical space and public opinion environment for the healthy development of contemporary Chinese literary criticism.

关 键 词：“人道主义” 四次论争 当代文学批评 人学属性 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]