检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹升生 李林露 Cao Shengsheng;Li Linlu
机构地区:[1]安徽师范大学历史学院 [2]四川大学历史文化学院
出 处:《军事历史》2024年第5期118-126,M0004,共10页Military History
摘 要:当代印度独立后,与周边国家冲突不断,战争史学成为印度史学的一个重要组成部分。进入新世纪之后,印度本土学者兴起了战争史的撰写,主要分为通史著作、个例研究两种类型。印度的战争史书写起步较晚,加之书写主体大多为军官,因而具有明显的主体和类型偏好,存在歪曲历史事实,以迎合印度政府重塑战争记忆诉求的倾向。这种政治化的学术书写会扭曲固化印度民众的战争认知,激化民族主义情绪,同时对印度周边外交起到一定阻碍作用。战争史书写中渗透的“敌人”叙事,已异化到印度的国防和外交谋划中。After its independence,India had conflicts constantly with its neighboring countries.Thus the war history had become an importance part in Indian historical studies.In the 21st century,Indian scholars began to write the history of war in general history works or case studies.The Indian writings of War started late,and were mostly done by military oficers with obvious preference on subjects and genres.To meet the demand of Modi government on reshaping the memory of the war,the facts were easily bent in their narratives.This politicized academic writing has consolidated the Indians'distorted perception of war,fanned nationalism,and hindered India's neighboring diplomacy.The narratives on"enemy"have permeated India's academic writing on history of war,and even affected its defense and diplomatic planning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.146.8