检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛爱新 霍增辉[1] XUE Aixin;HUO Zenghui(School of Humanities,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 102488,China)
出 处:《卫生软科学》2025年第2期53-57,共5页Soft Science of Health
基 金:教育部产学合作协同育人项目(231103145241835)。
摘 要:随着人工智能在医疗领域的应用和不断拓展,引发了诸多法律问题,如医疗人工智能所致医疗损害责任的主体认定问题。文章从医疗人工智能不存在独立意识和不可行财产处罚的视角,分析认为人工智能不具有承担侵权责任的能力,不具有成为损害责任主体的构成要件,因此,应用人工智能所致的医疗损害责任应由医疗人工智能的持有人或医疗机构承担。With the application and continuous expansion of artificial intelligence in the medical field,many legal questions have arisen,such as the recognition of the main body of tort liability for medical damage caused by medical artificial intelligence.From the perspective that there is no independent consciousness of medical artificial intelligence and it is not feasible to carry out property penalties for medical artificial intelligence,the article analyzes that artificial intelligence can not bear tort liability,and does not have the constitutive elements of the main body of tort liability for medical damage.Therefore,the tort liability for medical damage caused by the application of artificial intelligence should be borne by the holder of medical artificial intelligence or medical institutions.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R-052[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R922.16[政治法律—民商法学] D923.3[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.124