检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Fizza Hussain Yuefeng Li Md Mazharul Haque
出 处:《Communications in Transportation Research》2024年第1期382-392,共11页交通研究通讯(英文)
基 金:This research is funded by the Queensland University of Technology,iMOVE CRC,and supported by the Cooperative Research Centres program,an Australian Government initiative.
摘 要:Traffic conflict techniques rely heavily on the proper identification of conflict extremes,which directly affects the prediction performance of extreme value models.Two sampling techniques,namely,block maxima and peak over threshold,form the core of these models.Several studies have demonstrated the inefficacy of extreme value models based on these sampling approaches,as their crash estimates are too imprecise,hindering their widespread practical use.Recently,anomaly detection techniques for sampling conflict extremes have been used,but their application has been limited to estimating crash frequency without considering the crash severity aspect.To address this research gap,this study proposes a hybrid model of machine learning and extreme value theory within a bivariate framework of traffic conflict measures to estimate crash frequency by severity level.In particular,modified time-to-collision(MTTC)and expected post-collision change in velocity(Delta-V orΔV)have been proposed in the hybrid modeling framework to estimate rear-end crash frequency by severity level.Rear-end conflicts were identified through artificial intelligence-based video analytics for three four-legged signalized intersections in Brisbane,Australia,using four days of data.Non-stationary bivariate hybrid generalized extreme value models with different anomaly detection/sampling techniques(isolation forest and minimum covariance determinant)were developed.The non-stationarity of traffic conflict extremes was handled by parameterizing model parameters,including location,scale,and both location and scale parameters simultaneously.The results indicate that the bivariate hybrid models can estimate severe and non-severe crashes when compared with historical crash records,thereby demonstrating the viability of the proposed approach.A comparative analysis of two anomaly techniques reveals that the isolation forest model marginally outperforms the minimum covariance determinant model.Overall,the modeling framework presented in this study advances confl
关 键 词:Bivariate models Traffic conflicts Crash severity Crash frequency Generalized extreme value Anomaly detection techniques
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229