学术社会史的理论渊源和学术视域  

The Theoretical Origins and Academic Horizons of the Social Intellectual History

作　　者：罗检秋[1] LUO Jianqiu(Institute of Modern History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100101,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院近代史研究所,北京100101

出　　处：《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期133-142,共10页Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“社会史视野中的近代经学研究”(19AZS013)。

摘　　要：学术社会史理论上契合唯物史观,注重研究学术的复杂社会性。学术社会史发展了从先秦诸子到近代学者有关学术社会环境、著述语境的论述。学术社会史与社会文化史同中有异,虽皆立足于跨学科研究,借重社会史视角,但前者主要研究学术思想及其语境,多维度揭示学术的社会蕴含。与此同时,学术社会史兼重官方和民间文献,大幅拓展了学术史材料;既借鉴海外相关理论和方法,又植根于中国学术土壤,发扬传统史学的优长。学术社会史的理论自觉有益于构建中国史学的“自主知识体系”。Social intellectual history conforms to historical materialism at the theoretical level,with an emphasis on the complex social structures of intellectual studies.Social intellectual history has developed the studies of the social surroundings and scholarly discourses of those historical thinkers and scholars from the pre-Qin(classical time)to modern China.Social intellectual history distinguishes itself from social cultural history besides some shared commonalities.Although both are based on cross-disciplinary studies through the perspective of social history,but the former emphasizes intellectual studies and its context,and aims at reveling the social implications of scholarship(scholarly works)from multiple dimensions.Meanwhile,social intellectual history cares for both official and private sources,and therefore it significantly expands the range of materials for intellectual studies.Even though borrowing relevant theories and methods from abroad,social intellectual history has been rooted in the Chinese academic field to transmit the achievements and heritage of traditional historiography.The theoretical self-consciousness in the studies of social intellectual history is beneficial to the constructions of“independent knowledge system”of Chinese historiography.

关 键 词：学术社会史 史学传统 学术视域 唯物史观 

分 类 号：K03[历史地理—历史学]