检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王杜渐 唐庆来 柳发德 周兴祝 陶荣镇 WANG Dujian;TANG Qinglai;LIU Fade;ZHOU Xingzhu;TAO Rongzhen(Department of Urology,The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 211100,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属江宁医院泌尿外科,江苏南京211100
出 处:《现代泌尿外科杂志》2025年第1期29-33,共5页Journal of Modern Urology
摘 要:目的比较一次性输尿管软镜联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘(FV-UAS)及传统输尿管软镜鞘(UAS)治疗1~2 cm肾下盏结石的临床疗效与安全性,为肾下盏结石的治疗提供参考。方法回顾性分析2021年3月—2023年10月收治的157例接受输尿管软镜碎石术治疗的1~2 cm肾下盏结石患者的资料,其中80例患者采用传统UAS(传统UAS组),77例采用FV-UAS(FV-UAS组),比较两组患者的一般资料及临床资料。结果FV-UAS组术后即刻及最终结石清除率(SFR)均显著高于传统UAS组,差异具有统计学意义(84.4%vs.67.5%,P=0.013;88.3%vs.75.0%,P=0.032);传统UAS组术后发热、肾绞痛、肾周血肿等并发症发生率明显高于FV-UAS组(15.0%vs.5.2%,P=0.042)。两组患者术后并发症经抗感染、止痛药物治疗后均缓解,术后均无严重脓毒血症或感染性休克发生,且FV-UAS组住院费用明显低于传统UAS组[(18341±1519)元vs.(19152±1826)元,P=0.003]。结论相比传统UAS,FV-UAS联合一次性输尿管软镜治疗1~2 cm肾下盏结石具有较高的SFR和较低的并发症发生率,患者术后痛苦较小、恢复快,且住院费用更低,为肾下盏结石提供了新的治疗选择。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy(FURL)combined with flexible vacuum-assisted urethral access sheath(FV-UAS)and traditional UAS in the treatment of 1-2 cm lower renal calyceal stones,so as to provide reference for clinical practice.Methods Clinical data of 157 patients with 1-2 cm lower renal calyceal stones treated with FURL during Mar.2021 and Oct.2023 were retrospectively analyzed,including 80 treated with traditional UAS,and 77 with FV-UAS.General and clinical information of the two groups were compared.Results The immediate stone-free rate(SFR)(84.4%vs.67.5%,P=0.013)and final SFR(88.3%vs.75.0%,P=0.032)of the FV-UAS group were significantly higher than those of the traditional UAS group,with significant difference.The incidence of postoperative complications such as fever,renal colic,and perirenal hematoma was significantly higher in the traditional UAS group than in the FV-UAS group(15.0%vs.5.2%,P=0.042).After treatment with anti-infective and analgesic drugs,both groups were improved,and no severe sepsis or septic shock occurred after surgery.The hospitalization expenses of the FV-UAS group were significantly lower than those of the traditional UAS group[(18341±1519)yuan vs.(19152±1826)yuan,P=0.003].Conclusion Compared to the traditional UAS,the combination of FURL and FV-UAS for the 1-2 cm lower renal calyceal stones has a high SFR and low incidence of complications.Patients experience less pain,recover faster and spend less.It's a new treatment option for inferior calyceal calculi.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43