检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘凡立 陈文兴[1] LIU Fanli;CHEN Wenxing(AcademyofPublic Administration and Law,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou Fujian Province 350000,China)
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学公共管理与法学院,福建福州350000
出 处:《中国发展》2024年第6期25-32,共8页China Development
摘 要:传统网络虚拟财产是基于常规的“用户to网络服务商to用户”模式的虚拟财产,与基于区块链技术的新型网络虚拟财产相对。实务中传统网络虚拟财产出资标的多为网络店铺、公众号与短视频账号等,以此类财产出资的核心问题在于接受方无法对出资财产实现完全控制,其关键在于国内现有制度下当事人无法实现实名认证信息的变更。对此有必要适当借鉴域外经验,譬如韩国游戏产业相关规定以及英国数据资产“Midata”模式,向网络服务商施加协助变更权属,尤其是实名认证信息修改的服务义务,并在此基础上建立地区乃至全国的统一管理与服务平台,进而解决上述困境。Traditional network virtual property is a type of virtual asset based on the conventional"user-to network service provider-to-user"model,contrasting with the new network virtual property rooted in blockchain technology.In practical applications,traditional network virtual property investments often take the form of online shops,official accounts,and short video accounts.However,the central issue with such investments is that the re cipient cannot exercise full control over the invested assets.This stems from the inability of parties to effectuate changes in real-name authentication information under the current domestic system.Therefore,it is imperative to draw upon extra-territorial experience,such as the regulations pertaining to the gaming industry in South Korea and the"Midata"model in the Uk's concerning data assets.Network service providers should be mandated to facilitate ownership transfers,particularly by providing services for the modification of real-name authentication information.Furthermore,a unified management and service platform at the regional or even national level should be established to address these challenges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.20.224.152