马克思对蒲鲁东所有权思想的三重批判  

Marx's Triple Criticism of Proudhon's Thought of Ownership

作　　者：白刚[1] 程远航 Bai Gang;Cheng Yuanhang

机构地区：[1]吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心暨哲学社会学院 [2]吉林大学哲学社会学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《马克思主义理论学科研究》2024年第12期58-69,共12页Studies on Marxist Theory

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“马克思恩格斯超越德国观念论的逻辑演进与历史唯物主义形成研究”(23&ZD013)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：所有权表征的是人对物所有的客观事实。马克思虽然与蒲鲁东都从批判的角度理解所有权,但二人对所有权的阐释路径具有本质差别。蒲鲁东提出“所有权就是盗窃”的批判主张,以抽象正义观为理论底色将所有权“改装”为小资产阶级私有权,运用政治经济学的形而上学的方法固化所有权的辩证运动。马克思则基于劳动力的自我所有,借助生产正义原则提出劳动力所有权,发挥政治经济学辩证法批判的和革命的本质,阐释所有权的制度变革与历史发展,批判和超越资本主义所有权。在对所有权的政治经济学批判考察中,马克思完成了对蒲鲁东所有权思想之本质、原则以及方法的三重批判,实现了所有权的政治经济学革命。Ownership represents the objective fact that human owns things.Although both Marx and Proudhon understood ownership from a critical point of view,their approaches to the interpretation of ownership were substantively different.Proudhon put forward the critical claim that aownership is the?to,based on the theory of abstract justice view,transformed ownership into petty bourgeois private right,and used the metaphysical method of political economy to rigidize the dialectical movement of ownership.Marx based on the self-ownership of labor force,proposed the ownership of labor force with the principle of production justice,gave play to the critical and revolutionary nature of dialectics of political economy,explained the institutional change and historical development of ownership,and criticized and exceeded capitalist ownership.In the critical of the political economy of ownership,Marx completed the triple criticism of the essence,principle and method of Proudhon's ownership thought,and realized the political economy revolution of ownership.

关 键 词：所有权 劳动力所有权 政治经济学批判 辩证法 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]