数字贸易国际监管合作与类型选择——以“成本—收益”为视角的分析  

Typological Selection of International Regulatory Cooperation in Digital Trade——From the Perspective of Cost-Benefit Analysis

作　　者：蔡楠 徐崇利[1] CAI Nan;XU Chongli(School of law,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian,361005)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》2025年第1期16-35,共20页INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

摘　　要：数字贸易监管措施及其差异对数字贸易发展将产生重大影响,各国高度重视数字贸易谈判中的国际监管合作议题。当前,国际监管合作的形式多样,但类型划分尚有不足。鉴于国际监管合作与贸易协定的紧密联结,本文将监管合作方法与贸易协定置于统一的类型框架中,将数字贸易国际监管合作类型化为“合作方法+制度结构”的不同组合。在类型化的基础上,本文进一步引入“成本—收益”的分析工具,从监管同质性、监管偏好和交易频率三个变量出发揭示国家对数字贸易国际监管合作选择的原理,同时测量数字贸易监管规则的趋同化程度。本文研究对中国参与数字贸易国际监管合作具有一定的理论参考。Digital trade regulatory measures and regulatory dfferences have a significant impact on the development of digital trade,which also improve the importance of international regulatory cooperation issues in digital trade negotiations.At present,there are various forms of international regulatory cooperation,but the classification of international regulatory cooperation is insufficient.Given the close link between international regulatory cooperation and trade agreements,this paper puts the approaches of regulatory cooperation and institutional structures in the same typological framework,and the regulatory cooperation of digital trade can be classified into different combinations.From the variables of regulatory homogeneity,regulatory preference and transaction frequency,the cost-benefit analysis tool is further introduced to reveal the rationale of typological selection of international regulatory cooperation in digital trade,and can also measuring the degree of convergence of global regulatory rules for digital trade.In order to test the rationale,this paper takes the representative international regulatory cooperation models of digital trade in practice as analytic object.Finally,it has a certain theoretical value for China's participation in the international regulatory cooperation of digital trade.

关 键 词：数字贸易 国际监管合作 类型选择 “成本—收益”分析 监管趋同 

分 类 号：F744[经济管理—国际贸易]