帮助垄断协议行为“实质性”要件的解释论展开  

Expand the Interpretation of the“Substantive”Elements of Helping Monopoly Agreement Behavior

作　　者：李建欢 Li Jianhuan(Law School,Peking University,Beijing,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《天津法学》2024年第3期60-67,共8页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：2022年修正的《中华人民共和国反垄断法》第19条增加了禁止组织帮助垄断协议行为的新规定,补充了我国反垄断法的空白。但其中对帮助垄断协议行为中“实质性”要件的规定较为模糊,有进一步进行解释的必要。“实质性”构成要件的解释框架分为前提要件、客观要件、主观要件三类。前提要件包括:基础垄断协议要件、主体身份要件、实施可能性要件。客观要件包括:具体“帮助”行为要件、客观行为后果要件、因果关系要件,再对排除事由进行分析。主观要件以客观化推定为背景,以直接故意和间接故意两种故意情形作为主观要件。由此形成完整的解释链条和较为稳定的分析框架,并以此框架为基础结合市场竞争的场域变化进行丰富和补充。Article 19 of the“Anti-monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China”amended in 2022 adds new provisions prohibiting organizations from helping monopoly agreements,supplementing the gaps in China's anti-monopoly law.However,the provisions on the“substantive”elements in the act of helping monopoly agreements are vague,and there is a need for further explanation.The interpretation framework of“substantive”constitutive elements is divided into three categories:premise elements,objective elements and subjective elements.The premise elements include:basic monopoly agreement elements,subject identity elements,and implementation possibility elements.The objective elements include:specific“helping”behavior elements,objective behavior consequence elements,causality elements,and then analyze the exclusion reasons.The subjective element is based on the objective presumption,and the two intentional situations of direct intention and indirect intention are taken as the subjective elements.Thus,a complete explanation chain and a relatively stable analysis framework are formed,and based on this framework,the field changes of market competition are enriched and supplemented.

关 键 词：帮助垄断协议行为 实质性 前提要件 客观要件 主观要件 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]