检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡颖莉 朱洪革[1] 瞿子玉 CAI Yingli;ZHU Hongge;QU Ziyu(College of Economics and Management,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China)
机构地区:[1]东北林业大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040
出 处:《中国土地科学》2024年第12期143-154,共12页China Land Science
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2572024AW79)。
摘 要:研究目的:系统剖析社会资本参与生态保护修复的前因条件与组态路径,为优化政策设计、推动生态保护修复市场化供给提供策略建议。研究方法:结合推拉锚定理论构建社会资本参与生态保护修复的理论分析框架,并运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法分析社会资本参与生态保护修复的多种组态。研究结果:(1)各维度下的单一条件并非社会资本参与生态保护修复的必要条件,社会资本参与生态保护修复是多条件相互交织作用的结果;(2)社会资本参与生态保护修复的组态路径可归纳为经济效益导向型、环境规制驱动型和复合条件协同型三种组态类型;(3)投资回报机制和环境规制是社会资本参与生态保护修复的普遍性重要条件。研究结论:社会资本参与生态保护修复的组态路径呈现显著的差异性,经济效益导向型注重优化生态保护修复项目的投资回报机制,环境规制驱动型强调强化环境规制的强度及政府监管,复合条件协同型则发挥环境规制、公众关注和投资回报机制的互动协同作用,推动社会资本参与生态保护修复。The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze the causal conditions and configuration paths of social capital participation in ecological protection and restoration,providing strategic recommendations for optimizing policy design and promoting the market-based provision of ecological protection and restoration.The research methods are as follows.By integrating the push-pull-anchor theory,a theoretical framework for analyzing social capital participation in ecological protection and restoration is constructed.Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA)examines various configurations of social capital involved in ecological protection and restoration.The research results show that single conditions under each dimension are not necessary for social capital participation in ecological protection and restoration.Instead,such participation outcomes originate from the interplay of multiple conditions.The configuration paths of social capital participation in ecological protection and restoration can be categorized into three types,i.e.,economic benefit-oriented,environmental regulation-driven,and complex condition collaborative.Investment return mechanisms and environmental regulations are universally important conditions influencing social capital participation in ecological protection and restoration.It concludes that there are significant differences in the configuration paths of social capital participation in ecological protection and restoration.Specifically,the economic benefit-oriented type focuses on optimizing investment return mechanisms of ecological protection and restoration projects,the environmental regulationdriven type emphasizes on strengthening the intensity of environmental regulations and government supervision,and the complex condition collaborative type should leverage the interactive synergy among regulations,public concern,and investment return mechanisms to promote social capital participation in ecological protection and restoration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28