检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄竞 HUANG Jing(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,Hubei)
出 处:《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2024年第6期40-45,共6页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic
摘 要:作为争夺管辖权的工具,禁诉令在标准必要专利诉讼中的适用越来越频繁。我国企业在标准必要专利诉讼中面临平行诉讼威胁,频遭禁诉令冲击。为了反制,我国积极扩张适用禁诉令。然而我国无禁诉令的法律规定,而且频繁适用禁诉令会导致国际司法秩序混乱,引发欧盟起诉。为此,我国宜在适当借鉴域外经验基础上,谨慎适用禁诉令,构建以行为保全为基础的法律依据、建立阻断机制、推动国际协作以实现管辖权争议的实质解决。As a tool for competing for jurisdiction,injunction is applied more and more frequently in standard essential patent litigation.China's enterprises face the threat of parallel litigation in standard essential patent litigation,and are frequently hit by injunctions.In order to counteract this,China has been actively expanding the application of anti suit injunction.However,there is no legal provision for anti suit injunction in China,and frequent application of anti suit injunction will lead to the chaos of international judicial order and trigger the prosecution of the European Union.For this reason,China should,on the basis of appropriate reference to overseas experience,cautiously apply the anti-suit injunction,construct a legal basis based on behavioral preservation,establish a blocking mechanism,and promote international cooperation in order to realize the substantive resolution of jurisdictional disputes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90