检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘蓓蓓 贺莉 Liu Beibei;He Li(School of Literature and Law,Shanxi Jinzhong Institute of Technology,Jinzhong 030600)
出 处:《西部学刊》2025年第4期100-103,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:2023年最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部联合印发《关于办理醉酒危险驾驶刑事案件的意见》,标志着醉驾治理制度从形式到实质发生嬗变,有利于实现个案正义,体现宽严相济的刑事政策,注重综合治理和预防,但仍存在治理困境,表现为认定存在争议、各地裁量差异大且缺少预防性规定、操作不规范且工作负担重和犯罪附随后果影响大。完善醉酒型危险驾驶行为综合治理路径在于:(一)根据实践细化行政法规定;(二)构建轻罪前科消灭制度;(三)探索预防的综合治理新路径;(四)推动多方协同共商共治。In 2023,the Supreme People’s Court,the Supreme People’s Procuratorate,the Ministry of Public Security,and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the“Opinions on Handling Criminal Cases of Drunk Dangerous Driving”,which marks a transformation from form to substance in the governance system for drunk driving offenses.This approach is conducive to achieving individual justice,reflecting the criminal policy of tempering justice with mercy,and emphasizing comprehensive governance and prevention.However,there are still governance challenges,such as controversial determinations,significant differences in discretion across regions,the absence of preventive provisions,non-standard operations with heavy workload,and significant subsequent consequences of crimes.The pathways for comprehensive governance of drunk dangerous driving offenses can be improved by:(1)refining administrative legal provisions based on practice;(2)establishing a system for the elimination of minor criminal records;(3)exploring new pathways for comprehensive governance with a focus on prevention;(4)promoting collaborative governance through multi-party consultation and joint management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90