中国数字政府建设的政策工具选择与策略优化  

Policy Tool Selection and Strategy Optimization for Building the Digital Government in China

作　　者：蒋祖存 徐双敏[2] Jiang Zucun;Xu Shuangmin(Hubei Provincial Intellectual Property Training Base in Huanggang,Huanggang 438000,China;Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhang 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北省知识产权培训(黄冈)基地,湖北黄冈438000 [2]中南财经政法大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《学术论坛》2024年第6期134-145,共12页Academic Forum

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“城市群协同创新带动大中小城市协调发展研究”(23&ZD068);国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“新时代乡村数字治理的社会机制及效果研究”(23GFLB009);黄冈市党内法规研究中心重大课题“马克思主义党建思想中国化时代化最新理论成果研究”(202317704)。

摘　　要：数字政府建设是提升国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要举措,核心在于选择正确的政策工具。在相关研究的基础上,文章构建了数字政府建设政策工具的整合性框架,包括供给型、需求型、环境型三类政策工具以及战略规划、资源整合、平台搭建、人才供给、信息安全和技术创新等六个治理要素。研究发现,供给型、需求型、环境型三类政策工具呈现结构性失衡状况;数字政府治理要素分布不均,呈现巨大鸿沟的三级阶梯治理结构,影响数字政府建设的全面推进;政策工具在治理要素上呈现非均衡分布且差异显著,两者尚未实现预期的匹配效应;在地方实践探索、国家总体设计、地方贯彻落实三个阶段,政策工具与治理要素配备差异明显,由于地方经济社会发展水平不同,我国四大地区对政策工具与治理要素的选择存在明显差异。为了提升数字治理体系和治理能力现代化水平,我国应加大环境型和需求型政策工具的使用,强化三类政策工具的结构均衡与互补;各地政府应立足整体性思维,统筹推进各类治理要素的均衡与协调发展。与此同时,调适政策工具与治理要素高效匹配,协同推进数字政府建设的内涵式发展;进一步提升数字政府建设政策的针对性、有效性和可行性,因时因地制宜优化和完善数字公共政策。Building the digital government is an important measure to modernize China's governance system and capacity,and its core lies in selecting the right policy tools.Based on relevant research,this article constructs an integrated policy tool framework for building the digital government,including three types of policy tools such as supply-oriented,demand-oriented,and environmental policy tools,as well as six governance elements including planning,resource integration,platform construction,talent supply,information security,and technological innovation.Research has found that there exist structural imbalances among three types of supply-oriented,demand-oriented,and environmental policy tools.The distribution of governance elements for the digital government is uneven and there are huge gaps among three levels of governance structure,which affects the comprehensive advancement of building the digital government.The policy tools show an uneven distribution and significant differences in governance elements,and both have not yet reached the expected matching effect.There are significant differences in the allocation of policy tools and governance elements in the three stages of local practice exploration,national overall design,and local implementation.Due to different levels of local economic and social development,there are obvious differences in the allocation of policy tools and governance elements among the four major regions in China.To enhance the modernization of digital governance system and capacity,China should increase the use of environmental and demand-oriented policy tools and strengthen the structural balance and complementarity of the three types of policy tools.Local governments should adopt a holistic way of thinking and advance the balanced and coordinated development of various governance elements.At the same time,it is imperative to make policy tools effectively adapt to governance elements and advance the building of the digital government in a substantial and coordinated manner.In addition,it is

关 键 词：数字政府 政策工具 数字治理 政府治理 

分 类 号：D601[政治法律—政治学]