检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:TANG Weijian
机构地区:[1]Law School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China
出 处:《Frontiers of Law in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》2024年第4期359-378,共20页中国高等学校学术文摘·法学(英文版)
摘 要:When initiating public interest litigation,the procuratorates often face the dilemma of choosing between the model of administrative public interest litigation(APIL)and the model of civil public interest litigation(CPIL).However,only choosing either model has flaws and shortcomings.Both CPlL incidental to criminal action and that incidental to administrative action are also faced with many confusions and difficulties in concepts and implementation mechanisms.Given the direction of progress,the procuratorates should integrate the inherent institutional advantages of the model of APlL and the model of CPlL to develop an integrated model of procuratorial public interest litigation(PPIL)characterized by oneness and integrity.To this end,revising the dual legislative separation,where the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China and the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China separately regulate public interest litigation,is necessary.Formulating a unified"Public Interest Litigation Law"or"Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation Law"to establish an integrated PPIL model has become an inevitable trend.
关 键 词:procuratorial public interest litigation(PPIL) implementation model administrative preference civil preference incidental public interest litigation oneness model
分 类 号:U44[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158