检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田启林 程工[2] TIAN Qilin;CHENG Gong(School of English Studies,Zhejiang International Studies University,Hangzhou 310023,China;School of International Studies,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江外国语学院,浙江省杭州市310023 [2]浙江大学,浙江省杭州市310058
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2025年第1期41-54,共14页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目“强式最简命题视角下的句法省略机制研究”(24BYY027)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:孤岛限制是生成语法研究的核心议题之一。自从Ross(1967)发现这一限制以来,语言学家提出了各种假设来揭示其本质。然而,目前仍存在很多悬而未决的问题。本文在加标理论框架下重新评估主语孤岛、复杂名词短语孤岛和附加语孤岛的性质,并在Chomsky(2015)和Bo?kovi?(2016)的基础上,提出孤岛并非源自句法限制,而是源自解读失败的构想。此构想不但为孤岛研究提供了崭新的视角,而且在不忽视语义限制的情况下统一解释了各类强式孤岛,这种做法在学界尚属首次;此外,它还成功阐释了一些例外提取现象及跨语言差异。Island constraints are a central topic in generative grammar research.Since their discovery by Ross(1967),various hypotheses have been proposed to explain the nature of these constraints.However,many issues remain unresolved.This study re-evaluates the properties of subject,complex noun phrase,and adjunct islands within the framework of labeling theory.Based on Chomsky(2015)and Bo?kovi?(2016),it proposes that islands do not originate from syntactic restrictions but rather from interpretive failures.This proposition not only provides a fresh perspective for island research but also offers a unified account of strong islands without disregarding the semantic factors involved in adjunct islands,which makes a novel contribution to the field.Furthermore,this research successfully accounts for some exceptional extractions out of islands and their cross-linguistic differences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79