检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭新雨 Xinyu Tan
机构地区:[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院
出 处:《公共行政评论》2025年第1期67-88,197,198,共24页Journal of Public Administration
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“新时代基层干部担当作为的生成逻辑与促进机制研究”(21CZZ037)。
摘 要:新时代建设堪当民族复兴重任的高素质干部队伍、切实提高政府部门的创造性执行效能,亟须激励广大基层干部敢担当、善作为,这在重大突发公共危机情境中显得更为迫切。论文基于行为公共管理视角,整合工作要求-资源模型与自我决定理论,深刻剖析公共危机情境中基层干部担当作为的形塑逻辑。第一,研究基于典型案例分析,系统比较基层干部在公共危机情境中与常规治理情境中所面临的工作要求和工作资源的差异。第二,研究基于扎根理论研究法,提炼出公共危机情境中影响基层干部担当作为的核心因素--工作要求、工作资源、公共服务动机和繁文缛节。第三,研究通过对629套“领导-下属”匹配的调查数据进行分析,得出结论:基层干部面临的任务情境分为高要求-高资源、低要求-高资源、高要求-低资源、低要求-低资源四种类型,这四类任务情境分别对基层干部担当作为产生显著的正向或负向影响,公共服务动机、繁文缛节在其中发挥显著的调节效应。由此,论文实现了对基层干部担当作为的情境化研究,尤其是基于工作要求-资源模型和自我决定理论阐释基层干部担当作为的形塑过程,也为公共危机情境中基层干部的激励机制提供了重要管理启示。In the new era,establishing a high-quality cadre team capable of fulfilling the responsibilities of national rejuvenation and effectively improving creative execution efficiency requires motivating grassroots cadres to take charge and perform excellent.This becomes particularly crucial during major unexpected public crises.Grounded in the framework of behavioral public administration,this study integrates the job demand-resource model with self-determination theory to explore the underlying mechanisms that shape grassroots cadrestaking charge behaviors during public crises.Specifically,this study first systematically compares the differences in job demands and resources faced by grassroots cadres in the context of public crises and conventional governance through a typical case analysis.Second,utilizing the grounded theory research method,this study has effectively extracted the key factors constraining grassroots cadrestaking charge behaviors in the context of public crises,including job demands,job resources,public service motivation,and red tape.Third,this study analyzes survey data from 629 matched leader-subordinate pairs,leading to the conclusion that the task situations faced by grassroots cadres can be categorized into four types:high demand-high resource,low demand-high resource,high demand-low resource,and low resource-low demand.Each of these task situations exerts a significant impact on grassroots cadrestaking charge behaviors in either a positive or negative way.Notably,public service motivation and red tape serve as critical moderating factors.Hence,the study provides a contextualized understanding of the factors shaping grassroots cadrestaking charge behaviors,particularly through the lens of the job demand-resource model and self-determination theory.In light of our findings,important recommendations for policy makers regarding cadre incentive management in public crisis context are discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33