机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院脊柱外科,济南250031
出 处:《脊柱外科杂志》2025年第1期12-17,共6页Journal of Spinal Surgery
基 金:山东第一医科大学校级教育教学改革研究课题(XM2022131)。
摘 要:目的比较斜外侧椎间融合术联合侧方一体化钢板(OLIF-LF)与微创经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗单节段退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症(DLSS)的影像学和临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2019年2月—2022年12月收治的54例单节段DLSS患者临床资料,其中31例采用MIS-TLIF治疗(MIS-TLIF组),23例采用OLIF-LF治疗(OLIF-LF组)。记录并比较2组患者一般情况、手术基本情况、手术前后疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、椎间孔面积(IFA)、椎间孔高度(IFH)、椎间隙高度(IDH)、腰椎前凸角(LL)及融合率。结果所有手术顺利完成,所有患者随访13~19(16.3±2.7)个月。OLIF-LF组术中出血量、术后第1天引流量、手术时间和住院时间少于MIS-TLIF组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者术后即刻仍存在腰痛,但OLIF-LF组术后即刻和术后6个月时VAS评分低于MIS-TLIF组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者腰痛均随着时间延长显著缓解,末次随访时2组VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后各时间点ODI较术前显著改善,并随时间推移进一步改善直至稳定,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);各时间点ODI组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后各时间点IDH、IFH、IFA较术前显著改善,且术后各时间点OLIF-LF组IDH、IFH、IFA优于MIS-TLIF组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。OLIF-LF组末次随访时LL较术前显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);MIS-TLIF组末次随访时LL与术前相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1年,2组手术节段全部融合,融合率为100%。结论2种术式治疗单节DLSS均能获得满意的影像学和临床疗效。OLIF-LF的术中出血量和术后引流量更少,手术时间和术后住院时间更短,术后即刻腰痛缓解更显著,腰椎生理曲度恢复更好。Objective To compare the imaging and clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with lateral plate fixation(OLIF-LF)and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)in the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis(DLSS).Methods From February 2019 to December 2022,the clinical data of 54 single-level DLSS patients were retrospectively analyzed,including 31 cases were treated with MIS-TLIF(MIS-TLIF group)and 23 with OLIF-LF(OLIF-LF group).The general condition,basic surgical information,visual analog scale(VAS)score,Oswestry disability index(ODI),intervertebral foraminal area(IFA),intervertebral foraminal height(IFH),intervertebral disc height(IDH),lumbar lordosis angle(LL)at pre-and post-operation,and the fusion rate were recorded and compared.Results All the surgeries were successfully completed,and all the patients were followed up for 13-19(16.3±2.7)months.The intraoperative blood loss,first day drainage volume,operation time and hospital stay in the OLIF-LF group were all less than those in the MIS-TLIF group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Both groups of the patients still had lower back pain immediately after surgery,but the VAS score in the OLIF-LF group was lower than that in the MIS-TLIF group immediately after operation and at 6 months after operation,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Both groups of the patients showed significant relief of lower back pain over time,and there was no statistically significant difference in the VAS scores between the 2 groups at the final follow-up(P>0.05).Both groups showed significant improvement in the ODI at various postoperative time points compared to preoperative levels,and further improved over time until stability,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the ODI between the 2 groups at each time point(P>0.05).At each postoperative time point,IDH,IFH,and IFA in both groups showed significant
分 类 号:R681.533.2[医药卫生—骨科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...