回应时代的学术:从《边政公论》看1940年代中国学人的边政观  

The Scholarship of the Times:An Exploration of the Chinese Scholars' View of Border Politics in the 1940s from the Perspective of the Bianzheng Gonglun

作　　者：汪洪亮[1] 李强[2] Wang Hongliang;Li Qiang(School of History and Culture,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,610068,China;School of Archaeology and Museology,Sichuan University,Chengdu,610207,China)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学历史文化学院,成都610068 [2]四川大学考古文博学院,成都610207

出　　处：《民族学刊》2024年第12期68-77,149,共11页Journal of Ethnology

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“中国近代边疆学术史资料整理与研究”(22JZD035);国家社科基金重点项目“近代中国的边疆学学科建构与边疆研究”(22AZS017)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《边政公论》是20世纪前半期中国边疆研究的重要学术期刊。其创刊与中国边政学会的成立是民国边政学潮流中的标志性事件。抗战时期高校内迁,边疆研究复兴。大批学者将其实地调查及研究边疆的成果发表在《边政公论》,对于时人了解和关怀边疆及边疆人民认同国家和中华民族,均具有重要意义。这些成果主要涉及边政建设的三个方面:一是改革边疆政治,实现内政统一;二是开发边疆富源,实现经济发展;三是沟通融会边疆社会文化,实现边疆文化中华民族化,其要旨皆在于促进边疆发展与中华民族建构。当时学界对边疆民族问题的研究,无论是强调中华民族整体性,还是强调中国民族多元性,都认可国人应该团结起来,共同建设中华民族。这反映了中国1940年代“抗战建国”语境下思想与学术对时代的回应,从中可窥时人为铸牢中华民族意识,致力于开发边疆,整合国家力量以实现民族复兴使命的学术努力。TheBianzheng Gonglun( Public Discussions on Border Politics) served as a significant academic journal for the study of China's border areas during the first half of the 20th century.A large number of scholars published the results of their field investigations and research within its pages, which apparently was of great value for their contemporaries to understand and show concern for the borderlands and their inhabitants' identification with the country and the Chinese nation. These achievements mainly seemed to involve three aspects of border political construction: Firstly, what were the designs of scholars in the Republic of China regarding the direction and blueprints for adjusting border policies and reforming border political institutions. Secondly, what suggestions did scholars put forward for the measures to develop the border economy. Thirdly, what were the plans of scholars for the advancement of border education and the promotion of Chinese national culture.Evidently, commentators on the national government's border policies generally recognized the progressiveness of its policies. Notably, scholars with official affiliations often provided annotations and explanations for the government's border statecraft. In principle, the national government's border policies seemed impeccable as they all aimed at promoting the common development of the border region and the adjacent inland, in conjunction with building the Republic of China. However, the practical results were not remarkable, leading to numerous scholars petitioning the government for improved border policies. Results show that economic construction was a vital part of border administration. However, the development of the border economy was restricted by the natural environment. Consequently, to develop the border economy, efforts should be made to surmount the natural environment, effectively improve the border transportation infrastructure, strengthen border water conservancy construction, further improve the work of immigration to populate th

关 键 词：中华民族建构 边政建设 《边政公论》 

分 类 号：C957[社会学—民族学]