检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:应莹莹 朱祖飞 Ying Yingying;Zhu Zufei(Wenzhou University Law School,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325000,China;Hubei University Center for Legal Philosophy Research,Wuhan 430062,China)
机构地区:[1]温州大学法学院,浙江温州市325000 [2]湖北大学法哲学研究中心,武汉430062
出 处:《卫生法学》2025年第1期35-41,共7页Health Law
摘 要:电子病历数据不透明的现状导致医患矛盾加剧,病历信息真实性难以判断,患者在医疗纠纷的维权过程更加艰难。为此,需要从法理与实体法中明确患者对电子病历后台数据的知情权,并且通过改善电子病历的形式、建立全国互通的电子病历信息共享系统、设立客观中立的第三方监管机构、提高医疗机构法律意识、司法机构积极提供协助等方式为患者知情权提供保障。The current lack of transparency in electronic medical records exacerbates conflicts between doctors and patients,making it difficult to ascertain the authenticity of medical record information and complicating patients'efforts to defend their rights in medical disputes.Therefore,it is necessary to clearly establish patients'right to know regarding the backend data of electronic medical records both in legal theory and substantive law.This can be achieved by improving the format of electronic medical records,establishing a nationwide interoperable electronic medical record information sharing system,creating an objective and neutral third-party supervisory body,raising the legal awareness of medical institutions,and encouraging judicial institutions to actively assist in protecting patients'right to know.
关 键 词:电子病历 患者知情权 医疗纠纷 电子病历后台数据
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7