检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屈海宏[1] Qu Haihong(School of Marrism,Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College,Chongqing 400120,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆三峡医药高等专科学校马克思主义学院,重庆400120
出 处:《卫生法学》2025年第1期114-120,共7页Health Law
基 金:重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目“我国医师多点执业法律问题研究”(21SKGH330)。
摘 要:从2023年5月开始,国家相关部门开展了力度空前的医药领域反腐工作,收效良好。在中央纪委国家监委网站和其他媒体曝光的众多案件中,以医师腐败为主导的案例并不鲜见。由此,以医药反腐风暴为视角,以医师腐败为切入点,从医师执业法律边界的内涵、医师越界执业腐败的表现形式、规制医师越界执业腐败的对策等问题入手,以期理清思路,从而为解决医师医药腐败问题提供有效参考。Since May 2023, the relevant state departments have launched an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign in the pharmaceutical sector, yielding significant results. Among the many cases exposed by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission and other media outlets, cases dominated by physician corruption are not uncommon. Viewing this issue through the lens of the anti-corruption storm in the pharmaceutical sector, and focusing on physician corruption, this paper examines the connotations of the legal boundaries of medical practice, the forms of corrupt practices by physicians who exceed these boundaries, and countermeasures to regulate such practices. The aim is to clarify the issues and provide effective references for resolving the problem of physician corruption.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.194.168