检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:伍麒 唐义红 Wu Qi;Tang Yihong(Law School of Southwest Medical University,Lu Zhou,Sichuan 646000,China)
出 处:《卫生法学》2025年第1期121-126,共6页Health Law
摘 要:近年来互联网医疗纠纷频发。通过分析三个互联网医疗纠纷案例发现,互联网医疗第三方平台所涉及的法律责任主要分为平台涉及医疗广告虚假宣传、未尽到对入驻医师的资质审查和注意义务、未对医师执业行为和数据安全尽到注意和保管义务。目前我国互联网医疗的法律规制存在法律效力位阶低、义务和责任脱位、传统医疗损害责任纠纷机制不适应等问题。要加强建设互联网医疗相关配套法律、改进目前互联网医疗纠纷解决机制以及加强互联网医疗行业自律机制建设等措施以促进我国互联网医疗健康发展。In recent years,disputes over internet healthcare have gradually increased.By analyzing three cases of internet medical disputes,it is found that the legal responsibilities involved in third-party internet medical platforms are mainly divided into the following:The platform involving false publicity in medical advertisements;Failure to fulfill the qualification review and duty of regulation for resident doctors;Failure to regulation of practicing of doctors and to maintenance obligations of data security.Subsequently,the current legal regulation status of internet healthcare was elaborated,and it was pointed out that there are problems in China such as low legal effectiveness,dislocation of obligations and responsibilities,and inappropriate traditional medical injury dispute mechanisms.In response,it was proposed to strengthen the construction of supporting laws related to internet healthcare,improve the current internet healthcare dispute resolution mechanism,and promote the healthy development of internet healthcare in China.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7