检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张恩 高鹏程[2] ZHANG En;GAO Peng-cheng
机构地区:[1]湖北民族大学马克思主义学院 [2]北京大学政府管理学院
出 处:《科学决策》2025年第1期178-190,共13页Scientific Decision Making
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(22JJD810001);国家民委教研项目(23129);湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究项目(20Q107)。
摘 要:生成式人工智能技术的性能涌现与应用生态拓展,正在开启大国意识形态博弈新边疆。从技术与意识形态生成、发展的深层关系来看,科技发展与国家安全的政治博弈性、科技创新到全面应用的可信可控性、技术突破与公共治理规则的非同步构筑性、现实之变引发观念之变的生态反应性,构成了生成式人工智能与国家意识形态安全深度嵌联的内在逻辑。为确保生成式人工智能时代国家主流意识形态安全,须以技术治理为出发点,从技术层、主体层、生态层作出治道选择,以大力化用生成式人工智能技术之利,全面规治生成式人工智能技术之弊。The emergence and proliferation of performance and expansion of application ecology of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content(AIGC)technology is opening up a new frontier of ideological game among major powers.From the perspective of the deep interconnection between technology and ideological generation and development,the political gameplay between technological development and national security,the credibility and controllability of technological innovation to comprehensive application,the asynchronous construction of technological breakthroughs and public governance rules,and the ecological responsiveness of conceptual changes caused by changes in reality,constitute the inherent logic of the deep integration of AIGC and national ideological security.To ensure the mainstream ideological security of the nation in the era of AIGC,it is necessary to take technological governance as the starting point,and make governance choices from the technical,subject,and ecological levels,in order to vigorously utilize the advantages of generative artifi cial intelligence technology and eff ectively regulate its disadvantages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.93.141