检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康宁 KANG Ning
出 处:《经济社会史评论》2025年第1期50-63,M0004,M0005,共16页Economic and Social History Review
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“中世纪英格兰行会垄断与市场治理研究”(22BSS051)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:中世纪后期,英格兰行会频繁递交请愿书,要求维护其特许经营权,维持原有的市场秩序。请愿书依据特许状、城市宪章和行会章程,强调行会在会员资格、经营内容、稽查监管等方面的特权,但是随着经济发展,依赖权力赋予的特许经营权必然面临市场竞争的挑战,大量请愿书本身就意味着市场自由化倾向,而保护贸易自由是英格兰王国法律的重要原则。特许经营权与法律原则相抵牾,得不到完全支持,预示着包容自由竞争、鼓励多元主体的英格兰市场化趋势。Petitions were submitted frequently by guilds to demand the maintenance of the franchises and the preservation of the original market order in late medieval England.The guilds emphasized the privileges in terms of membership,business content and inspection based on the charters,borough charters,and guilds’bylaws.However,with the development of the economy,the franchises granted by power would inevitably be challenged by the market competition.The large number of petitions itself implied a tendency towards market liberalization,and protecting free trade was an important principle of the laws of the Kingdom.The franchises which contradicted with the legal principles were not fully supported,indicating the trend towards marketization in England which embraced free competition and encouraged a plurality of market players.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200