行政性垄断中经营者非法获利法律规制研究  

On Legal Regulation of Illegal Profits of Firms in Administrative Monopoly

作　　者：谢枕寒 XIE Zhenhan

机构地区：[1]暨南大学粤港澳大湾区竞争与发展研究院

出　　处：《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第12期41-52,共12页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：我国行政性垄断规制中滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争的行政主体需要承担相应的法律责任,但参与行政性垄断的经营者却极少被追究责任,其非法获利也未能受到妥善处理。究其原因,在于现有规制体系没有规制行政性垄断经营者非法获利的法律依据,亦缺乏具有解释力与支撑力的相应规制理论框架。应当以“恢复原状”理论为基础,短期内应通过强化行政主体履行责令改正的责任以处理经营者的责任问题,长期内应修订法律,并根据经营者在行政性垄断中的主观状态及实际作用,完善行政性垄断经营者的责任形式,明确规定并用罚款与没收违法所得的方式来规制经营者的非法获利。The regulation of administrative entities abuse of administrative power to exclude and restrict competition is an important task of China s anti-monopoly law enforcement.Administrative entities that abuse administrative power to exclude and restrict competition in administrative monopolies should bear corresponding legal responsibilities.However,operators involved in administrative monopolies are rarely held accountable,and their illegal profits have not been properly dealt with.The reasons are as follows.On one hand,there is no legal basis for regulating the illegal profits of operators in administrative monopolies in the existing regulatory system,and law enforcement agencies find it difficult to regulate the illegal profits of operators in administrative monopolies.On the other hand,academia lacks a corresponding regulatory theoretical framework with explanatory power and support.There are deficiencies in regulatory theories,making it difficult to effectively guide regulatory activities in practice.At present,there are several theories on regulatory theory in academia,such as“identity theory”,“deterrence theory”,“fault theory”,and“unjust enrichment theory”.These theories have their advantages and to a certain extent justify the regulation of the illegal profits of operators in administrative monopolies.However,these theories only support the regulation of the illegal profits of“actively participating”operators in administrative monopolies and encounter theoretical obstacles when dealing with“compulsorily participating”and“passive”operators in administrative monopolies.Therefore,it is necessary to absorb the advantages of existing theories and construct a“restitution”theoretical framework that can adapt to different types of operators in administrative monopolies to support regulatory activities.The regulation of the illegal profits of operators in administrative monopolies should be based on the“restitution”theory.In specific measures,it should be implemented in two steps.In

关 键 词：反垄断法 没收违法所得 责令改正 经营者非法获利 行政性垄断 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]