ARTificial:为何版权并非规制生成式人工智能之良策(下)  

作　　者： 侯慧如(译) 江东(译) Micaela Mantegna

机构地区：[1]美国哈佛大学伯克曼·克莱因中心 [2]阿根廷圣安德烈斯大学技术与社会研究中心 [3]英国皇家国际事务研究所 [4]世界经济论坛元宇宙理事会 [5]西南政法大学法学院

出　　处：《法治现代化研究》2024年第6期188-200,共13页Law and Modernization

摘　　要：生成式人工智能(GAI)的迅速发展和广泛应用引发了有关作者身份归属、作品独创性认定以及将受版权法保护的材料用于人工智能(AI)训练的使用伦理等复杂议题。随着AI监管措施日益增多,从创作者和社会的角度出发,分别解释了版权法无法妥善应对AI生成内容的微妙差异的原因。版权规则原本旨在激励创新,但其适用范围已扩张到涵盖了新的技术媒介。事实证明,这种扩张增加了版权规则应用的复杂性和不确定性。本文警示,进一步尝试对版权规则进行扩大解释以涵盖GAI的特殊性,很可能会使问题更加严重,同时无法实现版权保护创作者同意权、署名权和获得报酬权的既定目标。此外,这种扩张可能带来版权法过度扩张的风险,这将对社会和伦理人工智能(ethical AI)的发展产生负面影响。本文将从哲学、法律及实践三个维度,分四个部分探讨这些问题。The rapid advancement and widespread application of Generative Artificial Intelligence(GAI)raise complex issues regarding authorship,originality,and the ethical use of copyrighted materials for AI training.As attempts to regulate AI proliferate,this essay proposes a taxonomy of reasons,from the perspective of creatives and society alike,that explain why copyright law is illequipped to handle the nuances of AI-generated content.Originally designed to incentivize creativity,copyright doctrine has been expanded in scope to cover new technological mediums.This expansion has proven to increase the complexity and uncertainty of copyright doctrine's application-ironically leading to the stifling of innovation.In this essay,I warn that further attempts to expand the interpretation of copyright doctrine to accommodate the particularities of GAI might well worsen that problem,all while failing to fulfill copyright's stated goal of protecting creators'rights to consent,attribution,and compensation.Moreover,I argue that,in that expansion,there is the peril of overreaching copyright laws that will negatively impact society and the development of ethical AI.This essay explores the philosophical,legal,and practical dimensions of these challenges in four parts.

关 键 词：生成式人工智能 版权法 AI监管措施 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]