投资调解中保密性和透明度冲突的规范本质及化解路径  

作　　者：邵甜甜 

机构地区：[1]福州大学法学院

出　　处：《商事仲裁与调解》2024年第6期126-140,共15页Commercial Arbitration & Mediation

摘　　要：提高国际投资争端解决程序的透明度,是近年来ISDS机制出现的新趋势。运用调解方式解决投资争端的透明度要求与投资调解固有的保密性特征之间有着不可避免的冲突,这一冲突的本质是公众知情权的合理保障问题。在国际社会中,与公共利益相关的事项,公众知情权必然要受到保护,但依旧需要考虑保障公众知情权的界限以及公众实现知情权的途径。这些问题的解决方案必须是具体的,因为在一定程度上不确定的操作容易导致计划的流产。公众知情权界限的界定可以采用“可增加的负面披露清单”方式划定公众知情权的范围,而公众知情权的实现可以通过东道国政府定期向公众作信息披露的方式,同时参考“法庭之友”制度,适当允许第三方的参与。Improving the transparency of the international investment dispute settlement procedure is a new trend in the ISDS mechanism in recent years.The requirement for transparency in the settlement of investment disputes through mediation creates an inevitable conflict with the inherent confidentiality of investment mediation,the essence of which is the issue of reasonable guarantees of the public’s right to know.In the international community,the public’s right to know must be protected in matters related to the public interest,but it is still necessary to consider the boundaries of protecting the public’s right to know and the ways in which the public can realize the right to know.The solutions to these problems must be concrete,as a certain degree of uncertainty can easily lead to planned miscarriages.The scope of the public’s right to know can be delineated by means of a“list of negative disclosures that can be added”,and the realization of the public’s right to know can be achieved through the host government’s regular disclosure of information to the public,with reference to the amicus curiae system,and appropriate participation of third parties.

关 键 词：投资调解 保密性 透明度 冲突 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学] D996.4[政治法律—法学]