论国际商事仲裁中强制性规则对实体准据法的影响  

作　　者：李佳奇 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院 [2]伦敦政治经济学院

出　　处：《商事仲裁与调解》2024年第6期93-106,共14页Commercial Arbitration & Mediation

摘　　要：当事人的合意授权是国际商事仲裁庭裁决权力的渊源。然而,这种意思自治并非毫无限制,而是受强制性规则的约束,当事人之意思自治不得抵触其内容。而在国际商事仲裁中,案件实体和程序涉及的连结点较多,哪些连结点的强制性规则应当得以考量以及是否所有强制性规则在国际商事争议中都具有可适用性仍待明晰。仲裁庭可能基于当事人合同所选准据法、裁决可执行性、撤裁风险等考虑适用各连结点的强制性规则。在立法没有进行较为明确的规制时,强制性规则的适用容易出现扩张性和欠缺可预见性的缺点。因此,应当在立法层面对强制性规则的性质进行分类并分析各类连结点强制性规则对于国际商事仲裁实体准据法的影响。Parties’consensual authorisation is the source of the arbitral power of international commercial arbitral tribunals.However,the party autonomy is under limitations.Subject to mandatory rules,parties’autonomy shall not contradict the rules’content.In international commercial arbitration,the substantive and procedural aspects of cases involve many connecting points.Which connecting points should be considered to apply their mandatory rules,and whether all mandatory rules are of applicability in international commercial disputes remain to be clarified.Considering the parties’chosen applicable law of the contract,the enforceability of the award,the risk of setting aside the award,etc.,tribunals may apply the mandatory rules of different connecting points.In the absence of clear legislative regulation,the application of mandatory rules is prone to the disadvantages of expansiveness and lack of predictability.Therefore,the nature of mandatory rules should be categorized at the legislative level,and the impact of mandatory rules from different connecting points on the applicable substantive law of international commercial arbitration should be analyzed.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 强制性规则 实体法 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]