干化学法与尿沉渣联合法用于尿常规检验的临床效果比较分析  

Comparative analysis of clinical effect of dry chemical method and urine sediment combined method for routine urine examination

作　　者：陈琼 CHEN Qiong(Guizhou Panjiang Coal Power Group Co.,Ltd.,Hospital,Liupanshui 553536,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州盘江煤电集团有限责任公司医院,六盘水553536

出　　处：《实验室检测》2024年第9期100-102,共3页Laboratory Testing

摘　　要：目的观察和分析检验尿常规时使用干化学法与尿沉渣联合方法检验的临床效果。方法本次研究选取2022年1月—2022年6月在我院进行尿常规检验的150例患者,分为三组,实验组50例进行尿常规检验的患者使用干化学法,观察组50例进行尿常规检验的患者使用尿沉渣,对照组50例进行尿常规检验的患者使用干化学法与尿沉渣联合的方法,对比三组尿常规检验患者的尿常规检验的各指标检出情况、误诊率以及漏诊率。结果实验组与观察组尿常规检查各指标检出情况均小于对照组干化学联合尿沉渣法尿常规的各指标检出情况;使用干化学法进行尿常规检验的实验组误诊率为8%,漏诊率为14%,总错误率为22%;使用尿沉渣法进行尿常规检验的观察组误诊率为10%,漏诊率为18%,总错误率为28%;使用干化学法与尿沉渣联合方法进行尿常规检验的对照组误诊率为2%,漏诊率为2%,总错误率为4%,使用干化学法进行尿常规检验的实验组、使用尿沉渣法进行尿常规检验的观察组总错误率均大于使用干化学法与尿沉渣联合方法进行尿常规检验的对照组的总错误率,统计学意义差异有意义(P<0.05)。结论经过相关研究人员和患者的积极配合,在尿常规检验的临床效果观察这一研究活动中得出,使用干化学法与尿沉渣联合的方式在临床上进行尿常规检验效果最佳。Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effect of dry chemistry and urine sediment.Methods This study selected 150 patients in our hospital from January 2022 to June 2022,divided into three groups,experimental group of 50 patients with routine urine test using dry chemical method,observation group of 50 patients with urine routine test,the control group of dry chemistry method and urine sediment,and the detection of the index of patients in urine routine test.Results The comparison of each index in the experimental group and the observation group with routine urine test was less than that of urine routine test in the control group using the combined method of dry chemistry and urine sediment;the misdiagnosis rate in the experimental group with a routine urine test using dry chemistry was 8%,the missed diagnosis rate was 14%,the total error rate was 22%;the misdiagnosis rate in the observation group using the routine urine test was 10%,the missed diagnosis rate was 18%,the total error rate was 28%;the misdiagnosis rate of the control group with routine urine test using combined dry chemistry and urine sediment was 2%,the missed diagnosis rate was 2%,the total error rate was 4%,the total error rate of the experimental groups with routine dry chemistry urine testing and the observation groups with routine urine sediment testing was greater than that of the control group with routine urine testing using combined dry chemistry and urine sediment,the statistical significant difference was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion After the active cooperation of relevant researchers and patients,the clinical effect observation of urine routine test shows that the combination of dry chemistry and urine sediment is the best clinical effect.

关 键 词：尿沉渣 干化学法 联合检验 尿常规 

分 类 号：R446.12[医药卫生—诊断学]