静脉采血法和末梢采血法在血常规检验中的应用效果  

Application Effect of Venous Blood Sampling And peripheral Blood Sampling in Routine Blood Examination

作　　者：陈屿 Chen Yu(95866 Army Health Team Inspection Department,Baoding Hebei 071051,China)

机构地区：[1]95866部队卫生队检验科,河北保定071051

出　　处：《生命科学仪器》2024年第5期15-17,共3页Life Science Instruments

摘　　要：目的 分析静脉采血法和末梢采血法在血常规检验中的应用效果。方法 选择2023年1月至2024年1月于95866部队卫生队体检的60例体检人员为研究对象,根据血常规检验方式分为参照组和实验组,各30例。参照组采用末梢采血法进行检验,实验组采用静脉采血法进行检验。对比两组血常规检验各项指标、满意度及疼痛程度。结果 采血后即刻、采血后3 h、采血后6 h,两组血常规指标对比,P均<0.05。参照组体检人员满意度评分低于实验组,疼痛程度高于实验组,P<0.05。结论 在血常规检验中,静脉采血法的应用效果明显优于末梢采血法,能有效提高检验水平,增受检人员满意度,减轻疼痛程度。Objective:To analyze the application effect of venous blood sampling and peripheral blood sampling in routine blood examination.Methods:60 physical examination personnel from January 2023 to January 2024 in 95866 army health team were selected as the research object,and were divided into reference group and experimental group according to the routine blood examination method,with 30 cases in each group.The reference group was tested by peripheral blood sampling,while the experimental group was tested by venous blood sampling.The indexes、satisfaction and pain degree of routine blood tests were compared between the two groups.Results:The blood routine indexes of the two groups were compared immediately after blood collection、3 h after blood collection and 6 h after blood collection,P<0.05.The satisfaction score of physical examination personnel in the reference group was lower than that in the experimental group,and the degree of pain was higher than that in the experimental group,P<0.05.Conclusion:In routine blood test,the application effect of venous blood sampling method is obviously better than that of peripheral blood sampling method,which can effectively improve the test level,increase the satisfaction of the examinees and reduce the degree of pain.

关 键 词：静脉采血法 末梢采血法 血常规检验 应用效果 

分 类 号：R446.11[医药卫生—诊断学]