检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龙娟 杨慧 王学梅 Long Juan;Yang Hui;Wang Xuemei(Department of General Thoracic Surgery,Sihong Branch Jinting Hospital,Sihong Jiangsu 223900,China)
机构地区:[1]泗洪分金亭医院普、胸外科,江苏泗洪223900
出 处:《生命科学仪器》2024年第5期243-245,共3页Life Science Instruments
摘 要:目的 研究分析综合护理干预对食道癌(EC)手术患者术后并发症的影响。方法 选择2021年1月至2023年12月泗洪分金亭医院收治的70例EC手术患者,随机分为对照组(采用常规护理,35例)与干预组(采用综合护理干预,35例)。比较两组并发症、术后恢复时间、生活质量与护理满意度。结果 干预组并发症发生率为2.86%,低于对照组的17.14%,P<0.05。干预组术后恢复时间比对照组更短,P<0.05。护理后,干预组生活质量评分与护理满意度均高于对照组,P<0.05。结论 综合护理干预应用于EC手术患者护理中效果显著,可减少并发症,改善生活质量与护理满意度,加速术后恢复。Objective:To study and analyze the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on postoperative complications of patients with esophageal cancer(EC).Methods:From January 2021 to December 2023,0 patients with EC operation in Jinting Hospital of Sihong Branch were randomly divided into control group(35 cases with routine nursing)and intervention group(35 cases with comprehensive nursing intervention).Complications、postoperative recovery time、quality of life and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results:The incidence of complications in the intervention group was 2.86%,which was lower than that in the control group 17.14%,P<0.05.The postoperative recovery time of the intervention group was shorter than that of the control group,P<0.05.After nursing,the quality of life score and nursing satisfaction of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group,P<0.05.Conclusion:Comprehensive nursing intervention is effective in nursing patients undergoing EC surgery,which can reduce complications,improve quality of life and nursing satisfaction,and accelerate postoperative recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49