“毕竟”的语用特点及其语义类属  

Pragmatic Features and Semantic Category of Bijing’s

作　　者：徐铂 田静 XU Bo;TIAN Jing(Xiamen University,Xiamen Fujian 361005;Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学中国语言文学系,福建厦门361005 [2]北京师范大学文学院,北京100875

出　　处：《汉语学习》2025年第1期93-102,共10页Chinese Language Learning

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“面向国际中文教育的常用词用法知识资源建设与智能信息检索平台研究”(项目编号:22AYY014);世界汉语教学学会/汉考国际科研基金项目“《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》框架下的MCT与HSK连接研究”(项目编号:CTI2022B01)资助。

摘　　要：“毕竟”有两种用法,其一为标记最关键原因,以解释上下文,其二为标记追根究底所得的结论。本文分析了“毕竟”两种用法适用的语境和使用特点,指出其标记原因用法出现于因果句及含因果关系的让步转折句的转折部分,标记结论用法仅出现于让步转折句中,两种用法本质一致,语义可概括为标记共识性信息作为最关键论据,解释上下文,使听话人接受并理解;但二者形式略有差异,后一用法可视作前一用法的省略式。由于“毕竟”标记论据解释上下文的过程是一个暗含否定、多声互动的过程,本文将其定性为体现交互主观性人际意义的语气副词。The interpretations of bijing concern two usages,one is to mark the most crucial reason to explain the text,and the other is to label the conclusion obtained after the end.This paper analyzes the context and the pragmatic features of the two uses respectively,noting that the former use appears in the two-clause causal sentences and the turning part of the concessional sentence that contains a causal relationship,the latter use appeared only in the concessional sentences,the essence of both uses is consistent,and the core meaning can be summarized as“to mark consensual information as the most critical argument,and to explain the context so that the listener could accept and understand the situation mentioned”;but the two forms are slightly different,the latter use can be regarded as the omission of the former use.Since bijing’s marking arguments to explain the context is a multi-voice interaction process with implicit negation,this paper qualifies it as a modal adverb reflecting the interpersonal meaning of interaction subjectively.

关 键 词：“毕竟” 语用特点 语义类属 语气副词 

分 类 号：H195.3[语言文字—汉语]