检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王威 Wang Wei
机构地区:[1]广西民族大学,广西南宁530006
出 处:《法学杂志》2025年第1期38-55,共18页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:跨境个人信息流动相较于国内个人信息流动具有特殊性。从RCEP实施现状来看,存在数字贸易往来中多种个人信息保护规则并存的情况,加剧了“制度冲突”;大国之间的博弈加剧个人信息跨境规则的复杂性;跨境个人信息治理过程中存在信任度不够的问题;RCEP个人信息跨境流动规则过于笼统。在国内方面,我国现行个人信息跨境流动的法律规则之间存在冲突;个人信息跨境保护缺少行业自律机制;相关司法保护机制亟待完善,尚不能为跨境个人信息流动提供充分的制度供给。RCEP确定的自贸区是全球最大的自贸区,个人信息跨境流动非常频繁,本文结合党的二十届三中全会精神,在RCEP视野下,从两个方面——国际方面,要积极参与构建个人信息跨境流动国际规则的制定,增强《个人信息保护法》的域外适用效力;国内方面,在国家统筹管理个人信息跨境业务的情况下,须从完善国内个人信息跨境流动法律法规,明确境外数据接收主体的法律责任,完善个人信息跨境流动的司法保护体系,设置隐私执法部门和第三方认证机构等方面对相关制度予以完善——探讨构建中国个人信息跨境流动制度。Cross-border personal information flow is special compared with domestic personal information flow.From the perspective of the current situation of RCEP implementation,there is a situation in which multiple personal information protection rules are coexisting in digital trade,which aggravating the“institutional conflict”;the game between major countries aggravates the complexity of personal information cross-border rules;there is a problem of insufficient trust among countries in the process of cross-border personal information governance.In the domestic aspect,there are conflicts between the current legal rules of cross-border flow of personal information in China;lack of attention to private law protection mechanism;lack of industry self-discipline mechanism;the relevant judicial protection mechanism needed to be improved urgently,which it cannot provide sufficient institutional supply for cross-border personal information flow.The free trade zone determined by RCEP is the largest free trade zone in the world,and the cross-border flow of personal information is very frequent.Based on the spirit of the Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China,this paper,from the perspective of RCEP,actively participates in the formulation of cross-border global rules for personal information from two aspects,internationally,enhancing the extraterritorial application of the Personal Information Protection Law;Domestically,in the case of the country's overall management of personal information cross-border business,it is necessary to improve the relevant systems from the aspects of improving domestic legislation,developing third-party certification agencies,clarifying the legal responsibilities of overseas data recipients,and improving the judicial protection system for the cross-border flow of personal information,and exploring the construction of China's personal information cross-border flow system.
关 键 词:RCEP 个人信息跨境流动 机制研究 法律责任 司法保障
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D99[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.130