检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭伟其[1,2] Guo Weiqi
机构地区:[1]广州美术学院 [2]广州美术学院艺术与人文学院
出 处:《美术观察》2025年第2期23-27,共5页Art Observation
摘 要:中国传统画史研究不仅在19世纪末20世纪初为现代派艺术提供灵感,而且具有参与重审“艺术”概念的可能性。当代学者已经揭示出东西方艺术相互促成的历史,这为进一步讨论奠定了基础。作为现代学科的中国艺术史写作的确很难摆脱西方艺术史的基本框架,但是西方“艺术”与“艺术史”边界本身自20世纪以来持续松动,全球视野或多元比较的视野致力于提出新的方案,中国传统画史研究也有可能在新的视野下为此提供新的启发。边界上的行动,一方面指今天艺术史写作对“艺术”不断反思与重建,一方面指行动绘画在这一工作中所具有的巨大潜力。The traditional Chinese painting history not only provided inspiration for modernist art in the late 19th and early 20th centuries,but also had the potential to participate in the re-examination of the concept of"art".Contemporary scholars have revealed the history of mutual promotion between Eastern and Western arts,laying the foundation for further discussion.As a modern discipline,it is indeed difficult for Chinese art history writing to break free from the basic framework of Western art history.However,the boundaries of"art"and"art history"have been continuously loosening since the 2oth century.The global or multiple comparison perspectives have been committed to proposing new solutions.The study of traditional Chinese painting history may also provide new inspiration for this purpose under a new perspective.The actions on the boundaries,not only refer to the continuous rethinking and reconstruction of"arts"in art history writing today,butalso referto theenormous potential of actionpainting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28