戏剧形式对《起死》解读的影响  

The Influence of the Dramatic Form on the Interpretation of Resurrect the Dead

作　　者：唐敏[1] TANG Min(School of Theatre and Film,Sichuan Conservatory of Music,Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China)

机构地区：[1]四川音乐学院戏剧学院,四川成都610500

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2024年第12期28-34,共7页Journal of Leshan Normal University

基　　金：四川音乐学院校级项目“《起死》的戏剧和小说双重形式特征研究”(CYXS2020051)。

摘　　要：自出版以来,围绕《起死》的论争就没有停止过。之所以如此,主要是因为《起死》从形式上看明明是典型的戏剧,但读者却迫于外在的压力不得不将它作为小说来解读。《起死》因此具有了戏剧和小说双重特征,而这正是读者解读《起死》时产生论争和分歧的主要原因。从《起死》的戏剧特征看,它具有两个行动素模式。在这两个行动素模式中,主体和宾体互换了位置。而这两个行动素模式又相互作用,从而导致《起死》的主题暧昧不明。戏剧特征是解读《起死》的钥匙,受它的影响,作为小说的《起死》不仅叙述者处于绝对的零度,其隐含作者与人物之间的价值关系也暧昧不明。读者只能根据自己的需要和作品之外的信息来解读,论争和分歧因此不可避免。Since its publication,debates surrounding Resurrect the Dead have never ceased.The main reason is that the works formally belongs to classical drama but the readers under the outer pressure take it as a novel.As a result,it has dual characteristics which directly lead to a great argument and divergence.From the perspective of its dramatic feature,Resurrect the Dead has two actional models in which the subject and object interchange positions.These two actional models interact with each other,leading to ambiguity in the theme of Resurrect the Dead.The dramatic feature is regarded as the key to explaining Resurrect the Dead.Influenced by this feature,as a novel,Resurrect the Dead not only features an absolutely neutral narrator but also ambiguous value relationships between the implied author and the characters.As a result,the readers can only understand this work on the basis of their own need and some information outside the work,making debates and disagreements inevitable.

关 键 词：鲁迅 《起死》 戏剧 小说义 

分 类 号：I210.6[文学—中国文学]