机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院广安门医院南区肿瘤科,北京102600 [2]中国中医科学院广安门医院肿瘤科,北京100053
出 处:《中医肿瘤学杂志》2025年第1期16-24,共9页Journal of Oncology in Chinese Medicine
基 金:中国中医科学院广安门医院南区所级科研基金(编号:Y2022-08)。
摘 要:目的基于析因设计探讨皮内针联合大承气汤加减灌肠方对恶性肠梗阻(malignant bowel obstruction,MBO)患者肠黏膜屏障功能的影响。方法选取2023年7月~2024年11月中国中医科学院广安门医院南区收治的135例MBO患者作为研究对象,其中15例不符合纳入标准,最终纳入120例患者。采用随机数字法将患者分为4组,A组:甘油灌肠;B组:甘油灌肠+皮内针;C组:中药灌肠;D组:皮内针+中药灌肠,每组各30例。重复测量方差分析比较4组患者治疗前后症状评分、胃肠动力功能指标以及肠黏膜屏障功能指标、卡氏功能状态(Karnofsky performance status,KPS)评分。析因方差设计分析比较各组患者肠黏膜屏障功能指标。线性回归方法分析患者症状评分、胃肠动力功能指标与肠黏膜屏障功能指标的关联。结果4组患者治疗前、治疗7 d后、治疗14 d后的症状评分比较,经重复测量方差分析,结果显示:①不同时间点的症状评分均有差异(P<0.05);②4组患者症状评分均有差异(P<0.05),D组治疗后各评分最低;③4组患者症状评分变化趋势有差异(P<0.05)。4组患者治疗前、治疗7 d后、治疗14 d后的胃肠动力功能指标比较,经重复测量方差分析,结果显示:①不同时间点的胃肠动力功能指标均有差异(P<0.05);②4组患者胃肠动力功能指标均有差异(P<0.05),D组治疗后血管活性肠肽(vasoactive intestinal peptide,VIP)水平最低,胃泌素、胃动素水平最高;③4组患者胃肠动力功能指标变化趋势有差异(P<0.05)。对4组患者治疗前、治疗7 d后、治疗14 d后的肠黏膜屏障功能指标进行比较,经重复测量方差分析,结果显示:①不同时间点的D-乳酸、内毒素(endotoxin,ET)、二胺氧化酶(diamine oxidase,DAO)水平均有差异(P<0.05);②4组患者D-乳酸、ET、DAO水平均有差异(P<0.05),D组治疗后较其他三组水平低;③4组患者D-乳酸、ET、DAO水平的变化趋势有差异(P<0.05)。析因设计方差�Objective To explore the effect of intradermal needle combined with modified Dachengqi Decoction for enema on intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients with malignant bowel obstruction(MBO)based on factorial design.Methods A total of 135 patients with MBO admitted to Southern District,Guang’anmen Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences from July 2023 to November 2024 were selected as research subjects.Among them,15 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria,and 120 patients were finally included.The patients were divided into four groups by random number method,group A:glycerin enema;group B:glycerin enema+intradermal needle;group C:traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)enema;group D:intradermal needle+TCM enema,with 30 cases in each group.Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare symptom scores,indicators of gastrointestinal motility function and intestinal mucosal barrier function,and Karnofsky performance status(KPS)scores before and after treatment in four groups of patients.Factorial design analysis of variance was used to compare intestinal mucosal barrier function indicators of patients in each group.The correlation between symptom scores,gastrointestinal motility function indicators and intestinal mucosal barrier function indicators was analyzed by linear regression method.Results Symptom scores of four groups of patients were compared before treatment,after 7 days of treatment,and after 14 days of treatment.The results of repeated measures analysis of variance showed that:①There were differences in symptom scores at different time points(P<0.05);②There were differences in symptom scores among four groups of patients(P<0.05),with group D having the lowest scores after treatment;③There were significant differences in the trend of symptom scores among four groups of patients(P<0.05).Gastrointestinal motility function indicators of four groups of patients were compared before treatment,after 7 days of treatment,and after 14 days of treatment.The results of repeated meas
分 类 号:R273[医药卫生—中西医结合] R730.6[医药卫生—中医肿瘤科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...