检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任文荭 REN Wenhong(Law school,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China)
出 处:《宜宾学院学报》2025年第1期77-87,共11页Journal of Yibin University
基 金:国家社科重大研究专项“社会主义核心价值观融入生态文明法治建设的基本路径和法律样态研究”(19VHJ016)。
摘 要:区块链技术与环境治理具有许多契合之处,在环境治理领域有广阔的应用前景,而区块链在该领域中并未得到大规模的拓展应用。技术层面,区块链技术标准和自治行业体系存在空白;法律适用层面,区块链智能合约的公私性质不明,企业商业秘密保护和环境信息公开之间存在矛盾,复杂技术原理与公众参与之间关系紧张,以及在数据法律领域的具体适用模糊;法律监管方面,区块链内部的责任主体间责任分担不明确,外部的监管主体不完善。基于此,对于区块链在环境治理领域的监管应秉持包容审慎的理念,并在技术、法律适用和法律监管方面贯彻“法治+技治”的监管路径。Blockchain technology has many similarities with environmental governance,and has broad appli-cation prospects in the field of environmental governance,while blockchain has not been widely applied in this field on a large scale.There are gaps in the technical standards of the blockchain and the autonomous industry system at the technical level;at the level of legal application,the public-private nature of blockchain smart contracts is unclear,there are contradictions between the protection of corporate business secrets and the dis-closure of environmental information,the tension between complex technical principles and public participa-tion,and the specific application in the field of data law is vague;in terms of legal supervision,the responsibil-ity sharing between the responsible subjects within the blockchain is not clear,and the external regulatory sub-jects are imperfect.Based on this,the supervision of blockchain in the field of environmental governance should uphold the concept of inclusiveness and prudence,and implement the specific regulatory path of rule of"law+technology"in relevant environmental legislation,environmental law enforcement and environmental justice.
分 类 号:D922.683[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33