检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈翔 李尧[2] 廉洪宇 李子涛 SHEN Xiang;LI Yao;LIAN Hong-yu;LI Zi-tao(Geriatric Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,Hubei 430075,China;The Third Clinical College,Jilin University,Changchun,Jilin 130000,China;Second Department of Orthopedics,Red Flag Hos-pital,Mudanjiang Medical University,Mudanjiang,Heilongjiang 157011,China;Mudanjiang North Medicine Resource Development andApplication Collaborative Center,Mudanjiang,Heilongjiang 157011,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉科技大学附属老年病医院,湖北武汉430075 [2]吉林大学第三临床医学院,吉林长春130000 [3]牡丹江医科大学附属红旗医院骨外二科,黑龙江牡丹江157011 [4]牡丹江市北药资源开发与应用协同中心,黑龙江牡丹江157011
出 处:《中国矫形外科杂志》2025年第1期38-43,共6页Orthopedic Journal of China
基 金:黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(编号:SS2023H004)。
摘 要:[目的]采用荟萃分析评价胫骨高位截骨术(high tibial osteotomy,HTO)与胫骨高位截骨术联合关节镜下清理术(high tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopy,HTO-A)治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。[方法]检索建库至2024年1月在PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方和维普数据库中的文献,采用Revman 5.4软件对纳入文献进行荟萃分析。[结果]共纳入8篇文献,3篇随机对照试验,5篇回顾性队列研究。共纳入患者547例,其中HTOA组290例,HTO组257例。荟萃分析表明:HTO-A组术后膝关节活动度(MD=4.61,95%CI 1.28~7.94,P=0.007)、术后1个月(MD=-0.97,95%CI-1.79~-0.15,P=0.02)、3个月(MD=-0.51,95%CI-0.62~-0.40,P<0.001)、6个月(MD=-0.38,95%CI-0.46~-0.31,P<0.001)的VAS评分及术后1个月(MD=4.94,95%CI 3.15~6.73,P<0.001)、3个月(MD=4.30,95%CI 1.07~7.54,P=0.009)、6个月(MD=3.54,95%CI 2.47~4.61,P<0.001)、12个月(MD=4.26,95%CI 3.30~5.21,P<0.001)的HSS评分均优于HTO组,但两组术后并发症发生率(OR=0.58,95%CI 0.24~1.43,P=0.24)及术后12个月VAS评分(MD=0.00,95%CI-0.23~0.22,P=0.98)的差异无统计学意义。[结论]相较于单纯HTO,HTO-A术后具有更大的膝关节活动度、更好的膝关节功能和短期内更轻的疼痛症状,但术后并发症发生率和远期疼痛症状两者无明显差别。[Objective]To evaluate clinical efficacy of high tibial osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement(HTO-A)verusus high tibialosteotomy without arthroscopic debridement(HTO)by a meta-analysis.[Methods]The related literatures were searched in PubMed,Web ofScience,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,Wanfang and PP databases from January 2024,and a meta-analysis of the included literatureswas performed using Revman 5.4 software.[Results]A total of 8 literatures were enrolled into this study,including 3 randomized controlledtrials and 5 retrospective cohort studies,with 547 patients included,involving 290 in the HTO-A group and 257 in the HTO group.As re-sults of the meta-analysis,the HTO-A group was significantly superior to the HTO group in terms of postoperative knee range of motion(MD=4.61,95%CI 1.28-7.94,P=0.007),VAS score(MD=-0.97,95%CI-1.79~0.15,P=0.02)1 month,(MD=-0.51,95%CI-0.62~0.40,P<0.001)3 months,(MD=-0.38,95%CI-0.46~-0.31,P<0.001)6 months postoperatively,and HSS score(MD=4.94,95%CI 3.15~6.73,P<0.001)1 month,(MD=4.30,95%CI 1.07~7.54,P=0.009)3 months,(MD=3.54,95%CI 2.47~4.61,P<0.001)6 months and(MD=4.26,95%CI 3.30~5.21,P<0.001)12 months postoperatively.However,there were no significant differences in postoperative complication rate(OR=0.58,95%CI 0.24-1.43,P=0.24)and VAS score 12 months after surgery(MD=0.00,95%CI-0.23~0.22,P=0.98)between the two groups.[Conclusion]Compared with HTO alone,the HTO combined arthroscopic debridement has greater knee range of motion,better knee jointfunction and less pain symptoms in the short term,but there is no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications andlong-term pain symptoms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.135.25