管理学实证研究的严谨性:概念化与标准体系研究  

The Rigor of Empirical Research in Management:Conceptualization and Standards System

作　　者：章凯[1] 张娇娇 罗文豪[3] Zhang Kai;Zhang Jiaojiao;Luo Wenhao(School of Business,Renmin University of China;College of Business Administration,Capital University of Economics and Business;School of Economics and Management,North China University of Technology)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学商学院 [2]首都经济贸易大学工商管理学院 [3]北方工业大学经济管理学院

出　　处：《南开管理评论》2025年第1期199-208,共10页Nankai Business Review

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金重大项目(22XNL014);国家自然科学基金项目(72272002)资助。

摘　　要：管理学实证研究追求严谨性,但学界对严谨性的定义依然模糊,对其标准体系的认识也不够完善。本文在科学哲学层面为严谨性研究引入了新的理论基础,提出了新的严谨性定义和标准体系,区分出了过程规范性标准和结论适用性标准。其中,过程规范性标准包括理论严谨性和方法严谨性,结论适用性标准包括结果的可复制性和结论的外部效度。在此基础上,本文分别分析和论述了这四项严谨性标准所包含的评价指标和具体内容,并总结了在各项评价指标上出现的不良表现。最后本文讨论了该严谨性标准体系的内在逻辑与本研究的理论贡献,并分析了研究结果对提升管理学实证研究严谨性的启示。Empirical research in management places great emphasis on rigor,which is a critical criterion for evaluating the quality of research in the field.Over time,the importance of rigor has garnered widespread recognition and attention within the management research community.With advancements in research design,measurement techniques,and statistical methods,the methodological rigor of empirical management research has significantly improved.However,concerns about theoretical innovation and practical relevance of such research have increased among scholars.How should empirical management research proceed in the future?Existing reflections propose three effective paths for breakthroughs:(1)Returning to the essence of the discipline by addressing management practices directly,focusing on management phenomena,and advocating for research that is rooted in practice,seeks to understand practice,and aims to guide practice;(2)Returning to the spirit of science by recognizing scientific ethics and conducting responsible management research;(3)Returning to the principles of scientific development by critically ref lecting on the philosophy of management research and the empirical research paradigm,reexamining the essence and basic forms of management theory from the perspective of the philosophy of science,and identifying effective pathways for theoretical contributions.These reflections are valuable for comprehensively understanding and redefining management research.However,they generally neglect to critique the standards of rigor themselves.Could the current understanding of rigor in management literature be flawed or insufficient,thereby hindering its effective integration with theoretical innovation and practical relevance?Through a review of related literature,we find that while discussions on rigor in management research are extensive,the conceptual definition and standards system of rigor remain imprecise and incomplete.Moreover,the theoretical foundation for such analyses is underdeveloped.This study aims to systematica

关 键 词：科学哲学 实证研究 严谨性 标准体系 

分 类 号：C93[经济管理—管理学]