论NFT数字作品交易行为的法律定性及侵权赔偿数额的确定  

Legal Character of NFT Digital Works Transaction and Determination of Infringement Compensation

作　　者：李晨天一 LI Chentianyi(School of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Changning Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院,上海长宁200042

出　　处：《四川职业技术学院学报》2025年第1期84-88,共5页Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College

摘　　要：对于NFT数字作品发售和转售行为的法律定性在学术界存在争议。将作品上传至服务器的制作过程可能构成信息网络传播权侵权并无争议。但是NFT数字作品的发售与转售行为并不属于《中华人民共和国著作权法》的控制范畴。首先,NFT数字作品的转售并没有导致有形物质载体的转移,因此不属于发行权的控制范畴。其次,转售行为没有形成传播源向公众传播作品,因此不属于信息网络传播行为。NFT数字作品的转售等同于民法上的债权转让行为。这一观点在王某诉链盒公司侵害作品信息网络传播权纠纷案中已有体现。而NFT数字作品发售和转售的金额可以作为被告侵害信息网络传播权的违法所得考量因素。The legal character of NFT digital works transaction is controversial in academia.It is not disputed that the process of uploading works to servers may constitute infringement of the right of communication through network.However,the act of offering and reselling NFT digital works does not fall within the control of The Copyright Law.First,the resale of NFT digital works does not result in the transfer of the tangible material carrier,and therefore it does not fall within the control of the distribution right.Secondly,the resale does not form a source of communication to the public,and therefore does not belong to the act of information network communication.The resale of NFT digital works is equivalent to the assignment of credit in civil law.This viewpoint has been adapted in the case of Wang Mou v.Chainbox Company for infringement of the right of communication through network.The amount of NFT digital works offered for sale and resale can be considered as the defendant's illegal income for infringing the right of communication through network.

关 键 词：数字作品 NFT 发行权 信息网络传播权 债权转让 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]