检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨雪飞 YANG Xuefei(Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University,Guangzhou 510665,China)
出 处:《建筑经济》2024年第S2期123-125,共3页Construction Economy
摘 要:竞争性磋商采购工程项目最后的综合单价一般由首次报价的综合单价下浮得到,本文通过工程实例和理论分析,指出采用常规下浮方式计算的综合单价与最后总报价不对应,不能作为工程项目的计价依据,分析不对应的原因并说明单价与总价不对应造成的不利影响。为使单价与总价对应,从下浮率计算方式和磋商报价规则两个方面给出改进建议并进行验证,结果表明:按改进建议得到的综合单价可以作为项目的计价依据。In generally,the final comprehensive unit price of the engineering project procured by competitive negotiationis obtained by floating down the comprehensive unit price of the first quotation.Through engineering examples and theoretical analysis,this paper points out that the comprehensive unit price calculated by conventional reduction means does not correspond to the final total price,and can not be used as the basis of project pricing.The reason of the non-correspondence is given and the adverse effects are also listed.In order to make the unit price correspond to the total price,the suggestions for improvement are given from two aspects:the means of reduction and quotation rules,and the results show that the comprehensive unit price obtained according to the suggestions can be used as the basis of project pricing.
分 类 号:TU723.3[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44