金后“院本”流变考  

An Examination of the Flux of the“Yuanben”after the Jin Dynasty

作　　者：张华宇 谭帆[2] ZHANG Hua-yu;TAN Fan

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学思勉人文高等研究院,上海200241 [2]华东师范大学中国语言文学系,上海200241

出　　处：《求是学刊》2025年第1期151-161,188,共12页Seeking Truth

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“杂剧古今演变史及历代杂剧文献汇释”(19ZDA259)。

摘　　要：以往学界常存在“金院本”的思维定势,即院本的兴衰发展仅局限于金,且从未发展成为戏曲,多数戏曲史著也无意为其提供向后叙述的空间。事实上,院本在元明之际已具备成熟戏曲之要素,虽约于明万历年间逐渐淡出主流视野,但其“遗形”却在明清戏曲中留存,概念的延伸也使其生命得到了另一层面的延续。金后“院本”史述的残缺主要受“金院本”的思维定势以及“杂剧”与“院本”含混的双重影响。院本研究应包含形态演进与概念衍变两种维度,以此重新审度院本尤其是金后院本在戏曲史述中应有的地位。In the past,there was often a stereotype of“Yuanben in Jin Dynasty”in the academic world,that is,the rise and fall of Yuanben was only limited to Jin Dynasty and never developed into an opera.Most of the his-torical works of opera did not intend to provide space for its backward narration.As a matter of fact,the Yuan-ben had already possessed the elements of mature opera at the time of Yuan and Ming Dynasties.Although it gradually faded out of the mainstream vision during the Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty,its‘legacy’has sur-vived in the Dynasties of Ming and Qing operas,and the extension of the concept has enabled its life to be con-tinued at another level.After the Jin Dynasty,the lack of historical account of“Yuanben”is mainly affected by the stereotype of“Yuanben in Jin Dynasty”and the ambiguity between“poetic drama”and“Yuanben”.The study of“Yuanben”should include two dimensions:morphological evolution and conceptual change,so as to re-examine the position of Yuanben,especially the Yuanben in Late Jin Dynasty,in the history of opera.

关 键 词：院本 杂剧 戏曲 戏曲史 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]