关联性思维视野下当代中国司法的面相与路径  

Judicial Aspect and Path in Contemporary China from the Perspective of Correlative Thinking

作　　者：李拥军[1] Li Yongjun

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《法学》2025年第1期3-19,共17页Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“亲伦传统视阈下的中国法律制度的本土化研究”(项目号:23AFX007)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：司法是由人组织和实施的实践活动,而人又是生活在传统中的,所以不可避免地受到内化于民族的文化—心理结构的思维传统的影响,从而在运作模式上会表现出某种民族的特有面相。中国传统的关联性思维侧重对事物之间外在的相似性进行考察,不强调事物内在的因果逻辑。当代中国司法表现出来的治理型、服务型、效果导向型的特征或属性可以到这一思维传统中寻找根据。中国传统的关联性思维能够为类比、移情、协商、平衡等诸多的实用性的纠纷解决机制的成长和运用提供实质性的助力。从理论上讲,中国法治现代化进程应该是一个统属性思维逐步取代关联性思维的过程,然而统属性思维对当下的中国而言不具有当然的合理性,这源于思维方式的稳定性、现实生活的复杂性和中国情况的特殊性。思维传统为当下中国司法从多元的视角来观察和解决问题提供了助力。Judicature is a practice organized and implemented by people,and people live in the tradition,so it is inevitably influenced by the thinking tradition internalized in the national culture-psychological structure,so as to show some unique features of a nation in the mode of operation.Chinese traditional coordinative thinking focuses on the external similarity between things,but does not emphasize the internal causal logic of things.The characteristics or attributes of governance,service and result-oriented judicature in China can be found in the thinking tradition.Chinese traditional coordinative thinking can provide a substantial boost to the growth and application of many practical dispute resolution mechanisms such as analogy,empathy,negotiation and balance.In theory,the modernization of the rule of law in China should be a process of gradually replacing coordinative thinking with subordinative thinking.However,in fact,it is not necessarily reasonable for the current China.This non-natural rationality stems from the stability of the way of thinking,the complexity of real life and the particularity of the Chinese situation.The thinking tradition provides a boost for the current Chinese judicial system to observe and solve problems from multiple perspectives.

关 键 词：关联性思维 统属性思维 司法模式 解纷机制 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]