检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李隆国[1] Li Longguo
机构地区:[1]北京大学历史学系,北京100871
出 处:《史学月刊》2025年第2期110-121,共12页Journal of Historical Science
摘 要:近年来国内外学术界围绕封建话语展开了新的争论,固有的概念体系受到了置疑和解构。基于不同的学术史传统,当前已经形成了一种多元化封建话语格局。在这一背景下,通过将中国古代史学中的封建概念引入世界史领域,运用其所揭示的“帝权悖论”现象分析加洛林政治,这是一个全新的尝试。依据原始资料进行分析之后可知,加洛林王朝也存在类似于古代中国的封建之制,也需要通过封建家产与公益之间的转化以便赢得合法性。以中学之法研究西学,使得我们可以从古代历史的普遍性中重新发现加洛林封建政治。In recent years, domestic and foreign academic circles have launched new debates around feudal discourse, and the inherent conceptual system has been deconstructed.Based on different academic historical traditions, a diversified feudal discourse pattern has been formed.Under this background, this paper makes a tentative attempt to introduce the concept of feudalism from ancient Chinese historiography into the field of world history and to analyse Carolingian politics by applying the “paradox of royal authority” revealed by ancient Chinese experts.After analyzing the original data, it can be seen that the Carolingian dynasty also had a feudal system similar to that of ancient China, through which the Carolingians gained legitimacy by using their own resources for the public benefit of all the Franks.Borrowing terms from ancient China can therefore shed new light on Carolingian feudal politics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15