检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵雨露 Yulu Zhao(School of Law,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang Jiangsu)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏镇江
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第12期6923-6931,共9页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:本文旨在探讨家事纠纷案件类型化处理的必要性及其实践应用。研究首先明确家事纠纷案件的类型分布,进而分析类型化视角下家事纠纷诉讼机制的应用路径。通过对国内外家事纠纷案件类型化处理模式的比较考察,本文揭示了我国家事纠纷案件类型化立法与实务的桎梏,并提出了相应的改进建议。研究认为,通过类型化处理,可以有效提升家事纠纷解决的效率和公正性,进而实现家事纠纷的有效解决。The purpose of this paper is to explore the necessity and practical application of family dispute cases.Firstly,the distribution of family dispute cases is clarified,and then the application path of family dispute litigation mechanism from the perspective of typology is analyzed.Through a comparative investigation of the typological treatment models of family dispute cases at home and abroad,this paper reveals the shackles of the typological legislation and practice of civil dispute cases in China,and puts forward corresponding suggestions for improvement.It is concluded that the efficiency and fairness of family dispute resolution can be effectively improved through typological treatment,and the effective resolution of family disputes can be realized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222